Merge pull request #115 from time-machine-project/juhahenriksson-patc…

…h-59

Update RFC-0034.md

files/releases/RFC-0034/RFC-0034.md

@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ Digitising audio recordings usually requires a lot of resources, as not all work
 
 Signal retrieval from the original audio carriers is usually the most significant work step in terms of quality [^iasa1]. Preserving digitised and born-digital audio files requires regular transfers to a new storage medium and migrations to new file formats. These should be taken into account when the audio material is transferred from the original storage medium for the first time.
 
+A somewhat simpler audio digitisation workflow aimed at small and medium-sized cultural heritage organizations can be found in Europeana Digitization Handbook [^eur1].
+
 # Selecting materials for digitisation
 
 Digitising recordings is expensive and slow, and it takes a lot of human resources. If the audio collection to be digitized is extensive, choices must be made regarding what to digitise and in what order. In the selection and prioritisation of the material to be digitised, there are several different perspectives that should be taken into account. 
@@ -126,6 +128,7 @@ The technical metadata should preferably contain, for example, the following inf
 
 <!-- Footnote content. Only alphanumeric characters and underscores are allowed. Please keep alphabetical sorting -->
 
+[^eur1]: <https://europeana.github.io/fste-digitization-handbook/>
 [^iasa1]: <https://www.iasa-web.org/tc04/signal-extraction-introduction>
 [^iasa2]: <https://www.iasa-web.org/task-force>
 [^iasa3]: <https://www.iasa-web.org/tc05/232-components-optical-discs-and-their-stability>