-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seqera containers: POC 5 #47
Conversation
docker_arm64 { process.withName: 'PLOT_RUN_GANTT' { container = 'community.wave.seqera.io/library/click_pandas_plotly_express_typing:2e5e17c7ed2d1115' } } | ||
singularity { process.withName: 'PLOT_RUN_GANTT' { container = 'oras://community.wave.seqera.io/library/click_pandas_plotly_express_typing:a4af841350996386' } } | ||
singularity_arm64 { process.withName: 'PLOT_RUN_GANTT' { container = 'oras://community.wave.seqera.io/library/click_pandas_plotly_express_typing:3fe674b9fa7b15b8' } } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need withName selectors
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file is being loaded by the top level pipeline, as part of the regular pipeline config. So I think we do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, that's why I asked for module config, otherwise this is almost the same as proposal 4
includeConfig '../../modules/local/seqera_runs_dump/nextflow.config' | ||
include { PLOT_RUN_GANTT } from '../../modules/local/plot_run_gantt' | ||
includeConfig '../../modules/local/plot_run_gantt/nextflow.config' | ||
include { MULTIQC } from '../../modules/nf-core/multiqc' | ||
includeConfig '../../modules/nf-core/multiqc/nextflow.config' | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you proposing this new syntax? It is not currently supported
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hah, not intentionally
Closing as I invented some Nextflow syntax. |
Same as #46 except the
includeConfig
is alongside theinclude
, to make automation easier and also make it easier to trace config logic.👉🏻 See 2499af7 for only differences to #46
@bentsherman / others - will loading the config in the main script instead of
nextflow.config
like this break stuff / do weird things? I feel like it's bad practice, even if the code is easier to read.