Replace deprecated spin_until_future_complete with spin_until_complete

[hliberacki]

Signed-off-by: Hubert Liberacki [email protected]

[hliberacki]

Due to change in RCLCPP - ros2/rclcpp#1874 Pull request

[gbiggs]

Running CI:

[gbiggs]

It looks like you missed one.

[hliberacki]

It looks like you missed one.

Sorry, but which one do you mean? I've checked (hopefully correctly) and there is only a single call to spin_until_future_complete in this repository ;). Unless you meant something else

[gbiggs]

The offending function is at ros1_bridge/test/test_ros2_client.cpp:36. And I made a mistake, it's not one you missed, it appears to be a missing include. Check the bottom of this output log.

[hliberacki]

The offending function is at ros1_bridge/test/test_ros2_client.cpp:36. And I made a mistake, it's not one you missed, it appears to be a missing include. Check the bottom of this output log.

yes, that was because my changes to rclcpp are still not merged yet. Since the old method needs to be deprecated when new is introduced - merging it first would cause a warning which would break the ci.

the main PR has CI with all of my changes :)

[hliberacki]

ros2/rclcpp#1874 (comment) Passing CI with all related PRs linked and build together.

[methylDragon]

Just noting here that this is still pending the merge of:

• Add support for spin_until_timeout (#1821) rclcpp#1874

[gbiggs]

Since rclcpp#1874 has been merged, let's try a CI run.

[hliberacki]

Since rclcpp#1874 has been merged, let's try a CI run.

Sorry for the confusion, unfortunately there were dependencies which should've been merged together, and due to the fact that there are review findings in rclpy - this PR was reverted until all PRs are in correct shape. rclcpp#1874 - has all desprition about it.

[gbiggs]

That explains the failing CI then. Ping this PR when it's ready to go, then, so I don't forget about it.