Add rosbag2_to_video to rolling index

[bjsowa]

Please Add This Package to be indexed in the rosdistro.

rosbag2_to_video

The source is here:

https://github.com/fictionlab/rosbag2_to_video

Checks

• All packages have a declared license in the package.xml
• This repository has a LICENSE file
• This package is expected to build on the submitted rosdistro

[clalancette]

New package review checklist

• At least one of the following must be present
  • Top level license file:
  • Per package license files:
• License is OSI-approved: https://opensource.org/license/apache-2-0
• License correctly listed in package.xmls
• Public source repo: https://github.com/fictionlab/rosbag2_to_video, but this is a fork of the upstream
• Source repository contains ROS packages
• Each package meets REP-144 naming conventions

I have two issues that prevent me from approving this:

1. The version number is 0.0.0, which, while technically allowed, isn't great. I'd like to see that bumped to some number that isn't 0.
2. We've only given the real upstream 2 weeks to respond to a request for release. I'll suggest we wait a bit longer before deciding to make the fork official.

[bjsowa]

1. The version number is 0.0.0, which, while technically allowed, isn't great. I'd like to see that bumped to some number that isn't 0.

Fixed

2. We've only given the real upstream 2 weeks to respond to a request for release. I'll suggest we wait a bit longer before deciding to make the fork official.

What would be the appropriate time to consider the fork official?

[github-actions]

This PR hasn't been activity in 14 days. If you are still are interested in getting it merged please provide an update. Otherwise it will likely be closed by a rosdistro maintainer following our contributing policy. It's been labeled "stale" for visibility to the maintainers. If this label isn't appropriate, you can ask a maintainer to remove the label and add the 'persistent' label.

[bjsowa]

bump

[bjsowa]

@clalancette Could you reconsider it now?