Merge pull request opendatahub-io#135 from vaibhavjainwiz/sync_main

Sync Release to Main for 2.13

.buildkite/check-wheel-size.py

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import os
 import zipfile
 
-MAX_SIZE_MB = 200
+MAX_SIZE_MB = 250
 
 
 def print_top_10_largest_files(zip_file):

.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat.yaml

@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ tasks:
     value: 0.664
 limit: 1000
 num_fewshot: 5
+trust_remote_code: True

.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/Meta-Llama-3-8B-QQQ.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# bash .buildkite/lm-eval-harness/run-lm-eval-gsm-vllm-baseline.sh -m HandH1998/QQQ-Llama-3-8b-g128 -b 32 -l 1000 -f 5 -t 1
+model_name: "HandH1998/QQQ-Llama-3-8b-g128"
+tasks:
+- name: "gsm8k"
+  metrics:
+  - name: "exact_match,strict-match"
+    value: 0.419
+  - name: "exact_match,flexible-extract"
+    value: 0.416
+limit: 1000
+num_fewshot: 5

.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/Minitron-4B-Base-FP8.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# bash .buildkite/lm-eval-harness/run-lm-eval-gsm-vllm-baseline.sh -m mgoin/Minitron-4B-Base-FP8 -b auto -l 1000 -f 5 -t 1
+model_name: "mgoin/Minitron-4B-Base-FP8"
+tasks:
+- name: "gsm8k"
+  metrics:
+  - name: "exact_match,strict-match"
+    value: 0.233
+  - name: "exact_match,flexible-extract"
+    value: 0.236
+limit: 1000
+num_fewshot: 5

.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct-FP8W8.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# bash .buildkite/lm-eval-harness/run-lm-eval-gsm-vllm-baseline.sh -m nm-testing/Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct-FP8W8 -b auto -l 1000 -f 5 -t 1
+model_name: "nm-testing/Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct-FP8W8"
+tasks:
+- name: "gsm8k"
+  metrics:
+  - name: "exact_match,strict-match"
+    value: 0.578
+  - name: "exact_match,flexible-extract"
+    value: 0.585
+limit: 1000
+num_fewshot: 5

.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/models-small.txt

@@ -4,4 +4,7 @@ Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct-FP8-compressed-tensors.yaml
 Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct-INT8-compressed-tensors.yaml
 Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct-nonuniform-compressed-tensors.yaml
 Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct-Channelwise-compressed-tensors.yaml
+Minitron-4B-Base-FP8.yaml
 Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct-INT8-compressed-tensors.yaml
+Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct-FP8W8.yaml
+Meta-Llama-3-8B-QQQ.yaml

.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/test_lm_eval_correctness.py

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 import numpy
 import yaml
 
-RTOL = 0.02
+RTOL = 0.05
 TEST_DATA_FILE = os.environ.get(
     "LM_EVAL_TEST_DATA_FILE",
     ".buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct.yaml")
@@ -23,9 +23,12 @@
 
 
 def launch_lm_eval(eval_config):
+    trust_remote_code = eval_config.get('trust_remote_code', False)
+
     model_args = f"pretrained={eval_config['model_name']}," \
                  f"tensor_parallel_size={TP_SIZE}," \
-                 f"add_bos_token=true"
+                 f"add_bos_token=true," \
+                 f"trust_remote_code={trust_remote_code}"
 
     results = lm_eval.simple_evaluate(
         model="vllm",

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/README.md

@@ -3,30 +3,52 @@
 
 ## Introduction
 
-This directory contains the performance benchmarking CI for vllm.
-The goal is to help developers know the impact of their PRs on the performance of vllm.
+This directory contains two sets of benchmark for vllm.
+- Performance benchmark: benchmark vllm's performance under various workload, for **developers** to gain clarity on whether their PR improves/degrades vllm's performance
+- Nightly benchmark: compare vllm's performance against alternatives (tgi, trt-llm and lmdeploy), for **the public** to know when to choose vllm.
 
-This benchmark will be *triggered* upon:
-- A PR being merged into vllm.
-- Every commit for those PRs with `perf-benchmarks` label.
 
-**Benchmarking Coverage**: latency, throughput and fix-qps serving on A100 (the support for more GPUs is comming later), with different models.
+See  [vLLM performance dashboard](https://perf.vllm.ai) for the latest performance benchmark results and [vLLM GitHub README](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/README.md) for latest nightly benchmark results.
+
+
+## Performance benchmark quick overview
+
+**Benchmarking Coverage**: latency, throughput and fix-qps serving on A100 (the support for FP8 benchmark on H100 is coming!), with different models.
 
 **Benchmarking Duration**: about 1hr.
 
-**For benchmarking developers**: please try your best to constraint the duration of benchmarking to less than 1.5 hr so that it won't take forever to run.
+**For benchmarking developers**: please try your best to constraint the duration of benchmarking to about 1 hr so that it won't take forever to run.
+
+
+## Nightly benchmark quick overview
+
+**Benchmarking Coverage**: Fix-qps serving on A100 (the support for FP8 benchmark on H100 is coming!) on Llama-3 8B, 70B and Mixtral 8x7B. 
+
+**Benchmarking engines**: vllm, TGI, trt-llm and lmdeploy.
+
+**Benchmarking Duration**: about 3.5hrs.
+
+
+
+## Trigger the benchmark
+
+Performance benchmark will be triggered when:
+- A PR being merged into vllm.
+- Every commit for those PRs with `perf-benchmarks` label AND `ready` label.
+
+Nightly benchmark will be triggered when:
+- Every commit for those PRs with `perf-benchmarks` label and `nightly-benchmarks` label.
+
 
 
-## Configuring the workload
 
-The benchmarking workload contains three parts:
-- Latency tests in `latency-tests.json`.
-- Throughput tests in `throughput-tests.json`.
-- Serving tests in `serving-tests.json`.
+## Performance benchmark details
 
-See [descriptions.md](tests/descriptions.md) for detailed descriptions. 
 
-### Latency test
+See [performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md](performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md) for detailed descriptions, and use `tests/latency-tests.json`, `tests/throughput-tests.json`, `tests/serving-tests.json` to configure the test cases.
+
+
+#### Latency test
 
 Here is an example of one test inside `latency-tests.json`:
 
@@ -47,19 +69,19 @@ Here is an example of one test inside `latency-tests.json`:
 
 In this example:
 -  The `test_name` attributes is a unique identifier for the test. In `latency-tests.json`, it must start with `latency_`.
--  The `parameters` attribute control the command line arguments to be used for `benchmark_latency.py`. Note that please use underline `_` instead of the dash `-` when specifying the command line arguments, and `run-benchmarks-suite.sh` will convert the underline to dash when feeding the arguments to `benchmark_latency.py`. For example, the corresponding command line arguments for `benchmark_latency.py` will be `--model meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B --tensor-parallel-size 1 --load-format dummy --num-iters-warmup 5 --num-iters 15`
+-  The `parameters` attribute control the command line arguments to be used for `benchmark_latency.py`. Note that please use underline `_` instead of the dash `-` when specifying the command line arguments, and `run-performance-benchmarks.sh` will convert the underline to dash when feeding the arguments to `benchmark_latency.py`. For example, the corresponding command line arguments for `benchmark_latency.py` will be `--model meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B --tensor-parallel-size 1 --load-format dummy --num-iters-warmup 5 --num-iters 15`
 
 Note that the performance numbers are highly sensitive to the value of the parameters. Please make sure the parameters are set correctly.
 
 WARNING: The benchmarking script will save json results by itself, so please do not configure `--output-json` parameter in the json file.
 
 
-### Throughput test
+#### Throughput test
 The tests are specified in `throughput-tests.json`. The syntax is similar to `latency-tests.json`, except for that the parameters will be fed forward to `benchmark_throughput.py`.
 
 The number of this test is also stable -- a slight change on the value of this number might vary the performance numbers by a lot.
 
-### Serving test
+#### Serving test
 We test the throughput by using `benchmark_serving.py` with request rate = inf to cover the online serving overhead. The corresponding parameters are in `serving-tests.json`, and here is an example:
 
 ```
@@ -96,9 +118,36 @@ The number of this test is less stable compared to the delay and latency benchma
 
 WARNING: The benchmarking script will save json results by itself, so please do not configure `--save-results` or other results-saving-related parameters in `serving-tests.json`.
 
-## Visualizing the results
+#### Visualizing the results
 The `convert-results-json-to-markdown.py` helps you put the benchmarking results inside a markdown table, by formatting [descriptions.md](tests/descriptions.md) with real benchmarking results.
 You can find the result presented as a table inside the `buildkite/performance-benchmark` job page.
 If you do not see the table, please wait till the benchmark finish running.
 The json version of the table (together with the json version of the benchmark) will be also attached to the markdown file.
 The raw benchmarking results (in the format of json files) are in the `Artifacts` tab of the benchmarking.
+
+
+
+## Nightly test details
+
+See [nightly-descriptions.md](nightly-descriptions.md) for the detailed description on test workload, models and docker containers of benchmarking other llm engines.
+
+
+#### Workflow
+
+- The [nightly-pipeline.yaml](nightly-pipeline.yaml) specifies the docker containers for different LLM serving engines. 
+- Inside each container, we run [run-nightly-suite.sh](run-nightly-suite.sh), which will probe the serving engine of the current container.
+- The `run-nightly-suite.sh` will redirect the request to `tests/run-[llm serving engine name]-nightly.sh`, which parses the workload described in [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json) and performs the benchmark.
+- At last, we run [scripts/plot-nightly-results.py](scripts/plot-nightly-results.py) to collect and plot the final benchmarking results, and update the results to buildkite.
+
+#### Nightly tests
+
+In [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json), we include the command line arguments for benchmarking commands, together with the benchmarking test cases. The format is highly similar to performance benchmark.
+
+#### Docker containers
+
+The docker containers for benchmarking are specified in `nightly-pipeline.yaml`.
+
+WARNING: the docker versions are HARD-CODED and SHOULD BE ALIGNED WITH `nightly-descriptions.md`. The docker versions need to be hard-coded as there are several version-specific bug fixes inside `tests/run-[llm serving engine name]-nightly.sh`.
+
+WARNING: populating `trt-llm` to latest version is not easy, as it requires updating several protobuf files in [tensorrt-demo](https://github.com/neuralmagic/tensorrt-demo.git).
+

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/benchmark-pipeline.yaml

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ steps:
           containers:
           - image: public.ecr.aws/q9t5s3a7/vllm-ci-test-repo:$BUILDKITE_COMMIT
             command:
-            - bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/run-benchmarks-suite.sh
+            - bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/run-performance-benchmarks.sh
             resources:
               limits:
                 nvidia.com/gpu: 8
@@ -42,20 +42,20 @@ steps:
           - name: devshm
             emptyDir:
               medium: Memory
-  - label: "H100"
-    agents:
-      queue: H100
-    plugins:
-    - docker#v5.11.0:
-        image: public.ecr.aws/q9t5s3a7/vllm-ci-test-repo:$BUILDKITE_COMMIT
-        command:
-        - bash
-        - .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/run-benchmarks-suite.sh
-        mount-buildkite-agent: true
-        propagate-environment: true
-        ipc: host
-        gpus: all
-        environment:
-        - VLLM_USAGE_SOURCE
-        - HF_TOKEN
+  # - label: "H100"
+  #   agents:
+  #     queue: H100
+  #   plugins:
+  #   - docker#v5.11.0:
+  #       image: public.ecr.aws/q9t5s3a7/vllm-ci-test-repo:$BUILDKITE_COMMIT
+  #       command:
+  #       - bash
+  #       - .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/run-benchmarks-suite.sh
+  #       mount-buildkite-agent: true
+  #       propagate-environment: true
+  #       ipc: host
+  #       gpus: all
+  #       environment:
+  #       - VLLM_USAGE_SOURCE
+  #       - HF_TOKEN
 

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/tests/descriptions.md → .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md

@@ -1,47 +1,42 @@
 
 ## Latency tests
 
-This test suite aims to test vllm's end-to-end latency under a controlled setup.
-
 - Input length: 32 tokens.
 - Output length: 128 tokens.
 - Batch size: fixed (8).
-- Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
+- Models: llama-3.1 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
 - Evaluation metrics: end-to-end latency (mean, median, p99).
 
-### Latency benchmarking results
 
 {latency_tests_markdown_table}
 
-## Throughput tests
 
-This test suite aims to test vllm's throughput.
+## Throughput tests
 
 - Input length: randomly sample 200 prompts from ShareGPT dataset (with fixed random seed).
 - Output length: the corresponding output length of these 200 prompts.
 - Batch size: dynamically determined by vllm to achieve maximum throughput.
-- Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
+- Models: llama-3.1 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
 - Evaluation metrics: throughput.
 
-### Throughput benchmarking results
 
 {throughput_tests_markdown_table}
 
-## Serving tests
 
-This test suite aims to test vllm's real serving metrics.
+## Serving tests
 
 - Input length: randomly sample 200 prompts from ShareGPT dataset (with fixed random seed).
 - Output length: the corresponding output length of these 200 prompts.
 - Batch size: dynamically determined by vllm and the arrival pattern of the requests.
 - **Average QPS (query per second)**: 1, 4, 16 and inf. QPS = inf means all requests come at once. For other QPS values, the arrival time of each query is determined using a random Poisson process (with fixed random seed).
-- Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
+- Models: llama-3.1 8B, llama-3 70B, mixtral 8x7B.
+- We also added a speculative decoding test for llama-3 70B, under QPS 2
 - Evaluation metrics: throughput, TTFT (time to the first token, with mean, median and p99), ITL (inter-token latency, with mean, median and p99).
 
-### Serving benchmarking results
 
 {serving_tests_markdown_table}
 
+
 ## json version of the benchmarking tables
 
 This section contains the data of the markdown tables above in JSON format. 

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/convert-results-json-to-markdown.py

@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ def results_to_json(latency, throughput, serving):
     # document the result
     with open(results_folder / "benchmark_results.md", "w") as f:
 
-        results = read_markdown(
-            "../.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/tests/descriptions.md")
+        results = read_markdown("../.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/" +
+                                "performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md")
         results = results.format(
             latency_tests_markdown_table=latency_md_table,
             throughput_tests_markdown_table=throughput_md_table,