Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add accelerators to quick start table #1596

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: site
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aradys
Copy link

@aradys aradys commented Apr 2, 2024

  1. Create accelerators dropdown with following options and add it to quick start table:
  • Huawei Ascend
  • Intel Extension for PyTorch
  • Intel Gaudi
  1. Add commands to previous versions section

RFC: pytorch/rfcs#63

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 2, 2024

👷 Deploy Preview for pytorch-dot-org-preview processing.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fbe96ad
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-dot-org-preview/deploys/664daa0c7f2e7a0008d3b350

@jgong5
Copy link

jgong5 commented Apr 11, 2024

@soumith The draft is ready for review. The preview page is available here: https://deploy-preview-1596--pytorch-dot-org-preview.netlify.app/

@aradys aradys marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2024 07:15
@jgong5
Copy link

jgong5 commented Apr 25, 2024

hi @soumith - does the proposed web site look good to you? https://deploy-preview-1596--pytorch-dot-org-preview.netlify.app/
In brief, we added a new drop-down menu "Accelerators" on the "Compute Platform" tab and the menu contains the newer platforms: "Intel Gaudi", "Intel Extension for PyTorch" and "Huawei Ascend", with instructions how to install them on Linux.

@johnnynunez
Copy link

johnnynunez commented May 2, 2024

@aradys aradys had a problem deploying to pytorchbot-env May 3, 2024 17:43 — with GitHub Actions Failure
Copy link

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As mentioned in the RFC, this looks quite good but we do want to properly define backends expectations before updating the website.

The request change here is just to make sure we don't mistakenly merge this while the discussion is happening in the rfc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants