Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD] ⚠️ Bump ClusterCatalog API to v1 #380

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

@perdasilva perdasilva commented Sep 6, 2024

Bumps ClusterCatalog API to v1

Closes #341

@perdasilva perdasilva requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2024 14:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.88889% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 33.95%. Comparing base (6584e7e) to head (cd3937b).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/source/unpacker.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
...rnal/controllers/core/clustercatalog_controller.go 87.50% 3 Missing ⚠️
api/core/v1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
internal/source/image_registry_client.go 75.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
cmd/manager/main.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
internal/webhook/cluster_catalog_webhook.go 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #380   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   33.95%   33.95%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         698      698           
=======================================
  Hits          237      237           
  Misses        435      435           
  Partials       26       26           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold until we are ready to release

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 12, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva marked this pull request as draft September 12, 2024 11:43
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 12, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 13, 2024
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 25, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 4, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

promote API from v1alpha1 to v1
2 participants