Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update list of all supported wapiVersions in External DNS Operator Documentation #83270

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ankhande
Copy link

@ankhande ankhande commented Oct 9, 2024

Update list of all supported wapiVersions in external dns operator documentations

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-12220

Version(s):

4.16+

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-12220

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Currently in External DNS operator documentation, the wapiVersion present is "2.3.1" which is quite old as there are multiple new versions updated after that.

  • Here are the list of currently supported wapiVersions: 2.3.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.6.1, 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 2.8, 2.9, 2.9.1.
  • Unless explicitly stated in the release notes, previously available WAPI versions are intended to remain accessible and operative with later versions.

Also, we raised a test PR[1] with the latest wapiVersion "2.9.1" as the default version for tests, and it passed all the e2e tests. So, "2.9.1" seems to be working fine with our Infoblox instance.

So, we need to update the list of all supported wapiVersions in our product documentation[2] to avoid the confusion :
[1] openshift/external-dns-operator#229
[2] https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.16/networking/external_dns_operator/nw-creating-dns-records-on-infoblox.html

@ankhande
Copy link
Author

ankhande commented Oct 9, 2024

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 9, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2024

@ankhande: Can not set label peer-review-in-progress: Must be member in one of these teams: [team-red-hat]

In response to this:

/label peer-review-in-progress

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 9, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Hi @ankhande. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@PoornimaSingour
Copy link
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants