Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add trait terms mapped to EFO measurement classes #290

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023
Merged

Add trait terms mapped to EFO measurement classes #290

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

rays22
Copy link
Contributor

@rays22 rays22 commented Sep 8, 2023

Addresses #276.

@rays22 rays22 self-assigned this Sep 8, 2023
@rays22 rays22 marked this pull request as draft September 8, 2023 13:15
@rays22 rays22 changed the title Trait terms mapped to EFO measurement classes Add trait terms mapped to EFO measurement classes Sep 8, 2023
@rays22
Copy link
Contributor Author

rays22 commented Sep 8, 2023

  • 2023-09-08. The first four look like false errors, because these classes are biological attributes and I could confirmed that in Protege using oba-edit.obo` and they do not show up in my local robot_reports:
Violations: 22
-----------------
ERROR:      4
WARN:       18
INFO:       0

First 5 violations:
ERROR	biological-attribute-child-violation	OBA:2045212	rdfs:subClassOf	Not a subclass of biological attribute
ERROR	biological-attribute-child-violation	OBA:2045215	rdfs:subClassOf	Not a subclass of biological attribute
ERROR	biological-attribute-child-violation	OBA:2045219	rdfs:subClassOf	Not a subclass of biological attribute
ERROR	biological-attribute-child-violation	OBA:2045221	rdfs:subClassOf	Not a subclass of biological attribute
WARN	missing_definition	OBA:0000001	IAO:0000115	
ERROR Report failed!

@rays22 rays22 marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2023 09:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants