Set branch coverage to false

[drc38]

@lbbrhzn I don't think branch testing is working properly with the asyncio tests

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.31%. Comparing base (a268a86) to head (b1db75b).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1313      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.27%   95.31%   +4.03%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1387     1387              
  Branches      222        0     -222     
==========================================
+ Hits         1266     1322      +56     
  Misses         65       65              
+ Partials       56        0      -56     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lbbrhzn]

Why disable branch coverage? It would mean you only get coverage info after merging to main. I think we should look at coverage before merging to main.

[drc38]

Why disable branch coverage? It would mean you only get coverage info after merging to main. I think we should look at coverage before merging to main.

It does not relate to branches in Github but rather branching code eg an if statement. See https://coverage.readthedocs.io/en/latest/branch.html#branch

Where we test different parts of an if statement in separate async calls this appears to result in lots of partial coverage lines, which aren't in reality.

This was highlighted by #1300

[lbbrhzn]

ok, then it's fine.