Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade rekt to latest #7076

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

pierDipi
Copy link
Member

@pierDipi pierDipi commented Jul 4, 2023

Manual update since there are a few braking chanages with knative-extensions/reconciler-test#526

first commit upgrade deps and vendor, the rest fixes the issues.

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release label Jul 4, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 4, 2023
@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 4, 2023

/cc @creydr @Cali0707

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from Cali0707 and creydr July 4, 2023 13:51
@creydr
Copy link
Member

creydr commented Jul 4, 2023

/test unit-tests

1 similar comment
@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 4, 2023

/test unit-tests

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 4, 2023

/test upgrade-tests

@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ func IsAddressable(name string, timings ...time.Duration) feature.StepFn {
}

// Address returns a broker's address.
func Address(ctx context.Context, name string, timings ...time.Duration) (*apis.URL, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just trying to get a better idea of what's going on in the rekt tests, why are we switching from apis.URL to duckv1.Addressable? Is this because of an api change in the reconciler-test package?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this particular change is mostly aligning to the rekt API, in rekt, we needed CA certs from Addressable and having only URL wasn't enough.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense, thanks for the clarification!

@Cali0707
Copy link
Member

Cali0707 commented Jul 4, 2023

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 4, 2023

/retest-required

@pierDipi pierDipi requested a review from Cali0707 July 5, 2023 12:17
@Cali0707
Copy link
Member

Cali0707 commented Jul 5, 2023

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@Cali0707
Copy link
Member

Cali0707 commented Jul 5, 2023

/retest-required

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
@pierDipi pierDipi force-pushed the upgrade-rekt-main-04-07-2023 branch from 9f4e1d2 to 2817d5b Compare July 5, 2023 16:11
@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 6, 2023

/cc @creydr @Cali0707

/retest-required

Copy link
Member

@creydr creydr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 6, 2023
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Jul 6, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: creydr, pierDipi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 6, 2023

/test upgrade-tests

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 6, 2023

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 6, 2023

/retest-required

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 6, 2023

Upgrade test seems too much flaky lately ...

@pierDipi
Copy link
Member Author

pierDipi commented Jul 6, 2023

/test upgrade-tests

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 516a915 into knative:main Jul 6, 2023
22 of 28 checks passed
vishal-chdhry pushed a commit to vishal-chdhry/eventing that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
Manual update since there are a few braking chanages with
knative-extensions/reconciler-test#526

first commit upgrade deps and vendor, the rest fixes the issues.

---------

Signed-off-by: Pierangelo Di Pilato <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test-and-release Test infrastructure, tests or release lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants