[SYCL][ESIMD]Fix lsc_slm_block_load test

[fineg74]

No description provided.

[fineg74]

ESIMD/matrix_transpose_glb.cpp test failures are not related to the change

[v-klochkov]

I don't understand why this change can fix something.
It is even look wrong to me.
The initialization is done in int-type equivalent units - similarly as the verification is done later. That is done intentionally to avoid bits lost or roundings for FP types.
For example, Vals gets different numbers than 1M*GroupID when it is T and when it is Tuint.

[sarnex]

ExpectedVal in the verification for the transpose case is using T but the kernel uses Tuint, I assumed that's the problem.

[v-klochkov]

ExpectedVal in the verification for the transpose case is using T but the kernel uses Tuint, I assumed that's the problem.

Ough..., I see now. It seem it is some mess in init/use/verify code here. non-transpose verification has Uint to verify with expected values, but both transposed/non-transposed use the common LSM initialization code.

[v-klochkov]

AWS-CUDA fails are unrelated to changes in 2 ESIMD E2E tests. Proceeding to merge now.