Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Fix typo on comment #3158

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024
Merged

docs: Fix typo on comment #3158

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

ad3n
Copy link
Contributor

@ad3n ad3n commented Oct 6, 2024

Fix typo on comment

@ad3n ad3n requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2024 22:23
@ad3n ad3n requested review from gaby, sixcolors, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team October 6, 2024 22:23
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a correction to the comment in the Body method of the Bind struct within the fiber package. Specifically, a typographical error was fixed, changing "mşme" to "mime." There were no modifications to the logic or control flow of the method, and no new methods were added or existing methods removed.

Changes

File Change Summary
bind.go Updated comment in Body method to correct typo from "mşme" to "mime."

Possibly related PRs

  • chore(middleware/cache): fix typo #3145: The changes in this PR also involve correcting a typographical error in a comment, similar to the main PR's focus on fixing a typo in the Body method's comment.

Suggested reviewers

  • sixcolors
  • ReneWerner87

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A typo hopped away today.
"Mşme" now reads "mime" bright,
Making comments clear and right.
With each fix, we leap and cheer,
For clean code brings us all near! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85a5fb8 and 781b65d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • bind.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • bind.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.16%. Comparing base (85a5fb8) to head (781b65d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3158      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.18%   80.16%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         117      117              
  Lines        9044     9044              
==========================================
- Hits         7252     7250       -2     
- Misses       1360     1361       +1     
- Partials      432      433       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.16% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gaby gaby changed the title Fix typo on comment docs: Fix typo on comment Oct 7, 2024
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 2eba89a into gofiber:main Oct 7, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants