Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🩹 Fix: behavior of DefaultCtx.Fresh when 'Last-Modified' and 'If-Modified-Since' are equal #3150

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

miyamo2
Copy link
Contributor

@miyamo2 miyamo2 commented Sep 26, 2024

Description

If 'Last-Modified' and 'If-Modified-Since' are equal, then DefaultCtx.Fresh returns false.
However, if no updates have been made, the cache should not to be stale.
Thank you.

Type of change

  • Enhancement (improvement to existing features and functionality)

Checklist

  • Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
  • Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
  • Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for Fiber's documentation.
  • Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
  • Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
  • Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
  • Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
  • Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

Benchmarks(on GitHub Codespaces)

go test -v -run=^$ -bench=Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified -benchmem -count=4

Before

goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10880254               123.4 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10743270               109.9 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10766181               114.0 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10719219               108.6 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
PASS
ok      github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3     6.345s

After

goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10672034               110.4 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10670136               126.8 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10492482               114.3 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified-2      10615524               114.2 ns/op             0 B/op          0 allocs/op
PASS
ok      github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3     5.414s

@miyamo2 miyamo2 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2024 00:29
@miyamo2 miyamo2 requested review from gaby, sixcolors, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team September 26, 2024 00:29
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Fresh method in the DefaultCtx struct, specifically altering the comparison logic for lastModifiedTime and modifiedSinceTime. Additionally, the test suite for this method has been enhanced with new assertions to verify its behavior under different conditions related to HTTP caching headers. A benchmark function has also been added to measure performance.

Changes

Files Change Summary
ctx.go Modified the Fresh method to change the comparison logic from Before to Compare for lastModifiedTime.
ctx_test.go Updated Test_Ctx_Fresh with new assertions for header behavior; added Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Freshness checks will never stop.
With headers set, we dance and play,
Ensuring caching's here to stay.
So let us cheer, with joyful thumps,
For every change, our code now jumps! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f31914 and a52f0f9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ctx_test.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • ctx_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.18%. Comparing base (0c1f5ff) to head (a52f0f9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3150   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.18%   80.18%           
=======================================
  Files         117      117           
  Lines        9043     9043           
=======================================
  Hits         7251     7251           
  Misses       1360     1360           
  Partials      432      432           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.18% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
ctx_test.go (3)

1419-1430: Consider adding cleanup for acquired context

The benchmark function Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified acquires a context but doesn't release it. To ensure proper resource management, consider adding a cleanup step:

func Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified(b *testing.B) {
    app := New()
    c := app.AcquireCtx(&fasthttp.RequestCtx{})
    defer app.ReleaseCtx(c)  // Add this line for cleanup

    // ... rest of the function
}

This ensures that the acquired context is properly released after the benchmark, preventing potential resource leaks in extensive benchmark runs.


1400-1403: Approve new test cases with suggestion for organization

The new test cases for If-Modified-Since and Last-Modified headers are valuable additions to the Test_Ctx_Fresh function. They improve the test coverage for the Fresh method.

To further enhance the test structure, consider grouping these new cases with other similar header-based tests earlier in the function. This would improve the overall organization and readability of the test suite.

Example:

// Group all header-based tests together
c.Request().Header.Set(HeaderIfNoneMatch, "*")
// ... existing tests ...

// New tests
c.Request().Header.Set(HeaderIfModifiedSince, "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:28:00 GMT")
c.Response().Header.Set(HeaderLastModified, "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:28:00 GMT")
require.True(t, c.Fresh())

c.Request().Header.Set(HeaderIfModifiedSince, "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:27:59 GMT")
c.Response().Header.Set(HeaderLastModified, "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:28:00 GMT")
require.False(t, c.Fresh())

This organization would make it easier to understand and maintain all header-related test cases.


1419-1430: Approve new benchmark with suggestion for cleanup

The new Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified function is a valuable addition to the benchmark suite. It correctly tests the performance of the Fresh method with Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since headers.

To ensure proper resource management, consider adding a cleanup step:

func Benchmark_Ctx_Fresh_LastModified(b *testing.B) {
    app := New()
    c := app.AcquireCtx(&fasthttp.RequestCtx{})
    defer app.ReleaseCtx(c)  // Add this line for cleanup

    for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
        c.Response().Header.Set(HeaderLastModified, "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:28:00 GMT")
        c.Request().Header.Set(HeaderIfModifiedSince, "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:28:00 GMT")
        c.Fresh()
    }
}

This ensures that the acquired context is properly released after the benchmark, preventing potential resource leaks in extensive benchmark runs.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c1f5ff and 2f31914.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • ctx.go (1 hunks)
  • ctx_test.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
ctx.go (1)

627-627: Approval: Improved caching behavior for equal timestamps

This change correctly addresses the issue when 'Last-Modified' and 'If-Modified-Since' headers are equal. By using Compare instead of Before, the method now considers equal timestamps as "fresh", which is the correct behavior according to HTTP caching standards.

The new implementation lastModifiedTime.Compare(modifiedSinceTime) != 1 returns true when lastModifiedTime is either before or equal to modifiedSinceTime, effectively fixing the issue described in the PR objectives.

This change will prevent unnecessary cache invalidation when the resource hasn't been modified since the last request, potentially improving performance and reducing server load.

ctx_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
ctx_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gaby gaby added this to the v3 milestone Sep 26, 2024
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 44cd700 into gofiber:main Sep 26, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants