-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 645
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allocate cards and boundaries array separately in CardTable for large segment #1507
Open
lavenzg
wants to merge
5
commits into
facebook:static_h
Choose a base branch
from
lavenzg:export-D61747510-to-static_h
base: static_h
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity.
label
Sep 6, 2024
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747510 |
…dHeapSegmentBase (facebook#1510) Summary: The large heap segment type should have the same storage layout as current AlignedHeapSegment, and share a few common methods. Abstract these to a base class, and make both AlignedHeapSegment and JumboHeapSegment inherit from the base type. Differential Revision: D61675022
…er (facebook#1504) Summary: Large segment needs to be backed by a large storage size. StorageProvider currently always allocate fixed size of storage determined by HERMESVM_LOG_HEAP_SEGMENT_SIZE. This diffs adds support of allocating larger storage with below changes: 1. `newStorage()` and `deleteStoragr()` takes addition `sz` parameter. 2. For `MallocStorageProvider` and `VMAllocateStorageProvider`, simply change the previous fixed storage size to passed in `sz`. 3. For `ContiguousVAStorageProvider`, use a BitVector to manage allocations and deallocations. This can be improved later if we observe fragmentations. The support of enabling different sizes of heap segment will be added later. Differential Revision: D61676721
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
Summary: We need the segment size in several places, such as CardTable, heap segment itself and getting sizes for large object GCCell. Add this size into `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, in CardTableNCTest, when search dirty bits, we should start from kFirstUsedIndex instead of 0, since the value of `SHSegmentInfo` may write some bytes to non-zero. Differential Revision: D61807366
… segment (facebook#1507) Summary: For large segment, the fixed size for `cards` and `boundaries` array is not large enough to manage the entire segment. This diff adds pointers to the two arrays in SHSegmentInfo. For normal segment, the pointer just points to the inline array in CardTable. For large segment, it points to separately allocated array. Differential Revision: D61747510
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747510-to-static_h
branch
from
October 21, 2024 23:21
842e1eb
to
35204a9
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747510 |
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
… segment (facebook#1507) Summary: For large segment, the fixed size for `cards` and `boundaries` array is not large enough to manage the entire segment. This diff adds pointers to the two arrays in SHSegmentInfo. For normal segment, the pointer just points to the inline array in CardTable. For large segment, it points to separately allocated array. Differential Revision: D61747510
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
For large segment, the fixed size for
cards
andboundaries
array isnot large enough to manage the entire segment. This diff adds pointers
to the two arrays in SHSegmentInfo. For normal segment, the pointer
just points to the inline array in CardTable. For large segment, it
points to separately allocated array.
Differential Revision: D61747510