Make SHSegmentInfo explicit in CardTable #1505
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
5a67d25 to
df295ed
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2024
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
df295ed to
b44464a
Compare
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2024
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2024
Summary: Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
1 similar comment
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
b44464a to
b7d5ee9
Compare
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 14, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#1505 Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#1505 Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
b7d5ee9 to
0d7f717
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#1505 Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
0d7f717 to
5d6a9f2
Compare
lavenzg
added a commit
to lavenzg/hermes
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2024
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#1505 Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
5d6a9f2 to
6984bb2
Compare
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
Differential Revision: D61675022
…er (facebook#1504) Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#1504 Large segment needs to be backed by a large storage size. StorageProvider currently always allocate fixed size of storage determined by HERMESVM_LOG_HEAP_SEGMENT_SIZE. This diffs adds support of allocating larger storage with below changes: 1. `newStorage()` and `deleteStorage()` takes additional `sz` parameter. 2. For `MallocStorageProvider` and `VMAllocateStorageProvider`, simply change the previous fixed storage size to passed in `sz`. 3. For `ContiguousVAStorageProvider`, use a BitVector to manage allocations and deallocations. This can be improved later if we observe fragmentations. The support of enabling different sizes of heap segment will be added later. Differential Revision: D61676721
Summary: Pull Request resolved: facebook#1505 Currently `SHSegmentInfo` lives in the prefix of CardTable inline storage (to be specific, prefix of the `cards_` array). But this is only defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the `cards_` array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following diffs, in which we need to add more fields to `SHSegmentInfo`. In addition, `kFirstUsedIndex` should take into account of the size of `SHSegmentInfo`, since the size of `SHSegmentInfo` could be larger than `(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)` for small segment size. Differential Revision: D61747499
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D61747499 |
lavenzg
force-pushed
the
export-D61747499-to-static_h
branch
from
6984bb2 to
747a70c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary:
Currently
SHSegmentInfolives in the prefix of CardTable inlinestorage (to be specific, prefix of the
cards_array). But this isonly defined in one comment. Add it into a union with the
cards_array to make it clear. It also simplifies the reasoning of following
diffs, in which we need to add more fields to
SHSegmentInfo.In addition,
kFirstUsedIndexshould take into account of the size ofSHSegmentInfo, since the size ofSHSegmentInfocould be larger than(2 * kCardTableSize) >> kLogCardSize)for small segment size.Differential Revision: D61747499