Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 3.10 style imports not resolving correctly #594

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 14, 2024

Conversation

Gobot1234
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

fixes #591
fixes #590

Checklist

  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
    • This change has an associated test.
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed)
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, ...)

@JitPackJoyride JitPackJoyride mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2024
7 tasks
@Gobot1234 Gobot1234 requested a review from cetanu August 13, 2024 01:15
Copy link
Contributor

@JitPackJoyride JitPackJoyride left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Trying to approve because it looks good to me!

@Gobot1234 Gobot1234 merged commit f96f516 into danielgtaylor:master Aug 14, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pydantic option broken Fix support for optional syntax with 3.9
3 participants