Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove host container migration #4324

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vyaghras
Copy link
Contributor

@vyaghras vyaghras commented Dec 6, 2024

Issue number:

Closes #

Description of changes:

migrations: remove all the weak setting on downgrade 
migrations: Change public control host-container source metadata to object 
migrations: Change aws admin host-container source metadata to object 
migrations: Change public control host-container source metadata to object 
migrations: Change public admin host-container source metadata to object 
common_migrations: add new migrations to handle settings-generator as struct 
models: Add Strength enum and Setting-Generator struct 
apiclient: update README to document version 2 of /tx API 
shared-defaults: change public host container source setting-generator to table 
shared-defaults: change aws host container source setting-generator to table 
datastore: changes to match changes in Core kit datastore

Testing done:
Refer to testing in bottlerocket-os/bottlerocket-core-kit#294

Terms of contribution:

By submitting this pull request, I agree that this contribution is dual-licensed under the terms of both the Apache License, version 2.0, and the MIT license.

Updated the `commit_transaction` function to enable committing metadata
from pending transactions. In commit transaction we will first commit
metadata and then pending keys to correctly perform the check to
identify
if key exists or not.

The strength handling among pending and committed transaction is as:
If pending metadata is strong and committed metadata is weak, commit the
pending setting.

If pending metadata is weak, committed metadata is strong and
the setting is already available, do not downgrade from strong to weak.
Otherwise add the strength file with value as weak.

If pending and committed metadata are the same, no action is performed.

Additionally, made minor changes to metadata functions for improved
access and flexibility:
Introduced a `committed` field to dynamically access metadata in pending
transactions.
Replaced the hardcoded use of live committed metadata with this
committed variable ans pass Committed::Live from previous usages.

Refer commit:
bottlerocket-os/bottlerocket-core-kit@20a435e
Refer PR:
bottlerocket-os/bottlerocket-core-kit#294
…o table

Update the source from string like:
schnauzer-v2 render --requires 'aws@v1(helpers=[ecr-prefix])' --template
'{{ ecr-prefix settings.aws.region }}/bottlerocket-admin:v0.11.14'

To setting generator as object, that contains:
- command
- strength
- skip-if-populated
…r to table

Update the source from string like:
public.ecr.aws/bottlerocket/bottlerocket-admin:v0.11.14

To setting generator as object, that contains:
- command
- strength
- skip-if-populated
… struct

- RemoveWeakSettingsMigration: When we downgrade multiple version to a
  version where migrator is not aware of deleting the setting-generator
 as struct or the strength file. This migration will help us to delete
the strength and setting generator metadata.

- MetadataStringToStructMigration: migration to change host-containers
  source  metadata to struct from string.

- ReplaceSettingWithSettingGeneratorMigration: Migration to replace
  a setting with setting generator.

This migration will be used to convert a strong setting to a weak
setting.
…bject

This migration will change the public control host-container source to
setting-generator metadata(that will generate source using sundog)
on forward migration.

In backward migration, it will reset the value of the source as
string.
This migration will change the aws admin host-container source
setting-generator from string to object setting-generator metadata
(that will generate source using sundog) on forward migration.
We will also add a strength file with value "weak".

In backward migration, it will reset the value of the source setting
generator as string and delete the strength metadata.
…bject

This migration will change the public control host-container source to
setting-generator metadata(that will generate source using sundog)
on forward migration.

In backward migration, it will reset the value of the source as string.
We need this migration that will delete all the weak settings
and setting-generators.
This migration will change the public admin host-container source to
setting-generator metadata(that will generate source using sundog)
on forward migration.

In backward migration, it will reset the value of the source as string.
@vyaghras vyaghras force-pushed the remove_host_container_migration branch from f3531f7 to b77efc3 Compare December 6, 2024 19:02
@vyaghras
Copy link
Contributor Author

vyaghras commented Dec 6, 2024

☝️ Changed the Version in Twoliter.toml

@vyaghras vyaghras requested review from bcressey and cbgbt December 6, 2024 20:57
command = "schnauzer-v2 render --requires 'aws@v1(helpers=[ecr-prefix])' --template '{{ ecr-prefix settings.aws.region }}/bottlerocket-control:v0.7.18'"
strength = "weak"
skip-if-populated = true

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

[metadata.settings.host-containers.admin.source.setting-generator]
command = "schnauzer-v2 render --requires 'aws@v1(helpers=[ecr-prefix])' --template '{{ ecr-prefix settings.aws.region }}/bottlerocket-admin:v0.11.14'"
strength = "weak"
skip-if-populated = true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't skip-if-populated default to true? Can we omit this?

Comment on lines +66 to +67
#[snafu(display("Unable to de-serialize data: {}", source))]
DeSerialize { source: serde_json::Error },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
#[snafu(display("Unable to de-serialize data: {}", source))]
DeSerialize { source: serde_json::Error },
#[snafu(display("Unable to deserialize data: {}", source))]
Deserialize { source: serde_json::Error },

setting: "settings.host-containers.control.source",
old_val: OLD_CONTROL_CTR,
new_val: NEW_CONTROL_CTR,
setting_gen_command: "emitter public.ecr.aws/bottlerocket/bottlerocket-control:v0.7.17",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand where emitter comes from.

Comment on lines +10 to +13
migrate(ReplaceSettingWithSettingGeneratorMigration {
setting: "settings.host-containers.control.source",
old_val: OLD_CONTROL_CTR,
new_val: NEW_CONTROL_CTR,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's confusing to me to mix settings changes with metadata changes.

I would model this with a pair of migration types:

  • RemoveSchnauzerMigration - like ReplaceSchnauzerMigration, but removes the setting on upgrade if it matches. No-op on downgrade, like RemoveMetadataMigration.
  • Maybe ResetMetadataMigration where the upgrade and downgrade action is the same, and we delete the metadata both ways, so that storewolf fixes it up? In effect this would combine the behaviors of AddMetadataMigration and RemoveMetadataMigration.

Edit: having seen the RemoveWeakSettingsMigration - I think you want a similar ResetMetadataMigration that clears out all metadata for all settings. Otherwise it'll be easy to lose track of which settings might have metadata that persists on downgrade.

Ok(input)
}

/// No work to do on backward migrations, copy the same datastore
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment seems incorrect?

inner_map.remove("strength");
input.metadata.insert(key.clone(), inner_map);
}
input.data.remove(&key);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: add a comment that we're also removing the setting, not just the "strength" metadata

Comment on lines +2300 to +2310
// Remove all the setting generators with weak strength
for (key, inner_map) in input.metadata.clone() {
if let Some(Value::Object(_)) = inner_map.get("setting-generator") {
// We need to remove the setting-generators that are an object
// because the API in destination version is not aware about the
// object setting generator.
let mut inner_map = inner_map.clone();
inner_map.remove("setting-generator");
input.metadata.insert(key.clone(), inner_map);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should touch settings generators here

Suggested change
// Remove all the setting generators with weak strength
for (key, inner_map) in input.metadata.clone() {
if let Some(Value::Object(_)) = inner_map.get("setting-generator") {
// We need to remove the setting-generators that are an object
// because the API in destination version is not aware about the
// object setting generator.
let mut inner_map = inner_map.clone();
inner_map.remove("setting-generator");
input.metadata.insert(key.clone(), inner_map);
}
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants