-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FIX: re-enable the NL-index in ORCA and fix the Join2IndexApplyGeneric #807
Open
jiaqizho
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
jiaqizho:fix-orc-nl-index
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jiaqizho
changed the title
[DNM]FIX: re-enable the NL-index in ORCA and fix the Join2IndexApplyG…
[DNM]FIX: re-enable the NL-index in ORCA and fix the Join2IndexApplyGeneric
Dec 23, 2024
jiaqizho
force-pushed
the
fix-orc-nl-index
branch
3 times, most recently
from
December 24, 2024 10:11
0dc70ff
to
2e64e45
Compare
jiaqizho
changed the title
[DNM]FIX: re-enable the NL-index in ORCA and fix the Join2IndexApplyGeneric
FIX: re-enable the NL-index in ORCA and fix the Join2IndexApplyGeneric
Dec 24, 2024
jiaqizho
force-pushed
the
fix-orc-nl-index
branch
from
December 25, 2024 03:23
2e64e45
to
ecf6ca0
Compare
gfphoenix78
reviewed
Dec 26, 2024
src/backend/gporca/libgpopt/src/xforms/CXformJoin2IndexApplyGeneric.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
jiaqizho
force-pushed
the
fix-orc-nl-index
branch
from
December 26, 2024 07:30
ecf6ca0
to
f43036b
Compare
my-ship-it
approved these changes
Dec 26, 2024
checked the new plan, there are 2 Redistribute Motion in the plan before join, and the hash key is same. If I understood correctly, only one Redistribute Motion is enough. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #567
What does this PR do?
The
CXformJoin2IndexApplyGeneric
xfrom will create theCPhysicalInnerHashJoin
in ROOT path.But when
DynamicGet
in a child node, it doesn't go through any checks, which is incorrect.If the components of the current relationship are inconsistent with the group by key, the logical transformation will be invalid. After the current logical conversion success, the enforce phase will not be required to process the partial key by default.
Type of Change
Breaking Changes
Test Plan
make installcheck
make -C src/test installcheck-cbdb-parallel
Impact
Performance:
User-facing changes:
Dependencies:
Checklist
Additional Context
CI Skip Instructions