Skip to content

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key when using CILogonOAuthenticator oauthenticator

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 6, 2022 in jupyterhub/oauthenticator • Updated Jan 27, 2023

Package

pip oauthenticator (pip)

Affected versions

< 15.0.0

Patched versions

15.0.0

Description

Background

CILogon is a federated auth provider that allows users to authenticate
themselves via a number of Identity Providers (IdP), focused primarily on educational and
research institutions (such as Universities). More traditional and open IdPs
such as GitHub, ORCID, Google, Microsoft, etc are also supported.

CILogonOAuthenticator is provided by the OAuthenticator package, and lets users log
in to a JupyterHub via CILogon. This is primarily used to restrict a JupyterHub
only to users of a given institute. The allowed_idps configuration trait of
CILogonOAuthenticator is documented to be a list of domains that indicate the
institutions whose users are authorized to access this JupyterHub. This authorization
is validated by ensuring that the email field provided to us by CILogon has a
domain that matches one of the domains listed in allowed_idps.

Impact

If allowed_idps contains berkeley.edu, you might expect only users with valid
current credentials provided by University of California, Berkeley to be able to
access the JupyterHub. However, CILogonOAuthenticator does not verify which provider
is used by the user to login, only the email address provided. So a user can login
with a GitHub account that has email set to <something>@berkeley.edu, and that will
be treated exactly the same as someone logging in using the UC Berkeley official
Identity Provider. This has two consequences:

  1. Since GitHub (and most other providers we tested) only require you to verify
    your email once, a user can access a JupyterHub even if their access to
    the institution's IdP has been revoked or expired.
  2. CILogon supports hundreds of identity providers - if even one of them allows
    users to set any email ids without verifying, that can be used to impersonate
    any user on any other identity provider! While CILogon itself has a stellar
    security record, this particular method of doing authorization means an attacker
    would only need to compromise a single identity provider to compromise all of
    CILogon

We currently do not know of any identity provider that provides unverified
email addresses to CILogon, so this is not a severe known vulnerability. However,
there are hundreds of IdPs, and we could not try them all.

Patches

This patch makes a breaking change in how allowed_idps is interpreted. It's
no longer a list of domains, but configuration representing the EntityID of the
IdPs that are allowed, picked from the list maintained by CILogon.
So instead of berkeley.edu, you would specify urn:mace:incommon:berkeley.edu to
allow logins from users currently with berkeley.edu accounts. GitHub users
with a verified berkeley.edu email will no longer be allowed to log in.

For details on how to transition your CILogonOAuthenticator configuration to the patched version 15.0.0 or above, see the migration documentation.

References

@consideRatio consideRatio published to jupyterhub/oauthenticator Jun 6, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 6, 2022
Reviewed Jun 6, 2022
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 9, 2022
Last updated Jan 27, 2023

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

0.063%
(29th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-31027

GHSA ID

GHSA-r7v4-jwx9-wx43

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.