fix: enhance logging for request node #1463
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
packages/request-node/src/request/ipfsAdd.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-74: Summary of ReviewOverall, the changes in this file effectively address the PR objectives by enhancing logging and error handling in the
IpfsAddHandlerclass. The improvements include:
- Implementation of timeout handling and logging.
- Enhanced success logging with detailed IPFS operation results.
- Improved error logging with request data.
These changes will significantly improve the ability to monitor and debug the Request Node's IPFS operations.
Key points to consider:
- Add a comment explaining the conversion from seconds to milliseconds in the timeout setting.
- Ensure consistency in log messages between success and error cases.
- Address potential issues with logging large amounts of data or sensitive information in error logs.
Once these minor adjustments are made, the implementation will be robust and align perfectly with the PR objectives.
To further improve the logging system:
- Consider implementing a structured logging format (e.g., JSON) to make log parsing and analysis easier.
- Implement log correlation by including a unique request ID in all log messages related to a single operation.
- Consider adding log levels (e.g., INFO, WARN, ERROR) to facilitate log filtering and analysis.
These enhancements would make the logging system even more powerful and aligned with best practices in distributed systems.
packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (1)
Line range hint
35-109: Overall excellent improvements aligning with PR objectives!The changes made to the
PersistTransactionHandlerclass significantly enhance the logging capabilities of the Request Node, addressing the key objectives outlined in the PR summary and linked issue #1391. Here's a summary of the improvements:
- Implemented timeout logging, addressing the objective of logging timeout events.
- Enhanced logging for both successful and failed transactions, improving readability and analyzability.
- Clearly labeled logged data with relevant identifiers (transactionHash, channelId, topics).
- Consolidated relevant information in single log entries, making it easier to correlate data.
These enhancements will greatly facilitate better monitoring and debugging of the Request Node.
To further improve the logging architecture, consider:
- Implementing a structured logging format (e.g., JSON) throughout the application for easier parsing and analysis.
- Adding log correlation IDs to trace requests across different components of the system.
- Standardizing log levels and message formats across all logging statements for consistency.
These architectural improvements would further enhance the observability and maintainability of the Request Node.
packages/request-node/src/requestNode.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-193: Summary: Additional logging enhancements needed to fully meet PR objectives.While the addition of morgan middleware improves request logging, several objectives from the PR are not yet addressed:
- Logging responses for all endpoints.
- Logging timeout events.
- Clearly labeling logged data with Channel ID, Request transaction ID, and on-chain transaction ID.
- Logging both request transaction ID and on-chain transaction ID along with IPFS CID when applicable.
To fully meet the PR objectives, consider the following suggestions:
- Implement response logging, possibly by extending the morgan middleware or adding a custom middleware.
- Add a timeout handling mechanism with associated logging.
- Extend the existing logging in individual request handlers (e.g.,
persistTransactionHandler,getConfirmedTransactionHandler) to include the required IDs.- Implement a centralized logging function that ensures consistent formatting and inclusion of all required information.
Would you like assistance in designing and implementing these additional logging features?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/request-node/package.json (2 hunks)
- packages/request-node/src/request/ipfsAdd.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/request-node/src/requestNode.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/request-node/package.json (3)
61-61: Approved: Addition of Morgan for enhanced loggingThe addition of the Morgan dependency (^1.10.0) is a good choice for improving the logging capabilities of the Request Node. This aligns well with the PR objectives to log every incoming request and outgoing response.
70-70: Approved: Addition of @types/morgan for TypeScript supportThe addition of @types/morgan (^1.9.9) as a dev dependency is appropriate. It provides TypeScript type definitions for Morgan, which will enhance development experience and type safety when using Morgan in the project.
61-61: Verify Morgan implementation in the codebaseThe addition of Morgan and its type definitions is a good step towards enhancing logging. To ensure full implementation:
- Verify that Morgan is properly configured and used in the main application file.
- Check if Morgan's logging format is customized to include Channel ID, Request transaction ID, and on-chain transaction ID as per the objectives.
- Ensure that timeout events are also being logged, which might require additional configuration beyond Morgan.
To help verify the Morgan implementation, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify where and how Morgan is being used in the codebase, as well as check for timeout logging implementation.
Also applies to: 70-70
packages/request-node/src/requestNode.ts (1)
14-14: LGTM: Morgan import added correctly.The import statement for the morgan logging middleware is correctly placed and uses the appropriate syntax.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/request-node/package.json (2 hunks)
…Network/requestNetwork into fix/request-node-logging
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/request-node/src/request/ipfsAdd.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (3)
33-35: LGTM: Improved transaction hash handlingThe introduction of the
transactionHashvariable usingnormalizeKeccak256Hashis a good addition. It aligns with the PR objective of clearly labeling logged data and will improve log correlation and readability.
79-85: LGTM: Improved 'confirmed' event loggingThe updated 'confirmed' event handler now includes both
transactionHashandchannelIdin the log message. This change addresses the PR objective of logging both request transaction ID and on-chain transaction ID, improving log correlation and readability.
98-104: LGTM: Concise and informative success loggingThe updated success logging now includes
transactionHashandchannelId, while removing unnecessary details liketopicsandtransactionData. This change aligns with the PR objectives of logging every request and clearly labeling logged data. The use of 'metric' and 'successRate' tags is also beneficial for log analysis.
Thanks @MantisClone, good review requests. I have addressed them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (1)
Line range hint
63-86: Improved logging for transaction persistence and confirmationThe addition of detailed logging before persisting the transaction and in the 'confirmed' event handler significantly enhances the observability of the Request Node. This change addresses the objectives of logging every incoming request and clearly labeling logged data.
For consistency and improved readability, consider using template literals for the log messages:
this.logger.debug( `Persisting Transaction: ${JSON.stringify({ transactionHash, channelId: clientRequest.body.channelId, topics: clientRequest.body.topics, transactionData: clientRequest.body.transactionData, })}`, ); // ... and in the 'confirmed' event handler: this.logger.info( `Transaction confirmed: ${JSON.stringify({ transactionHash, channelId: clientRequest.body.channelId, })}`, ['metric', 'successRate'], );This change would make the log messages more consistent and easier to read.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/request-node/src/request/ipfsAdd.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/request-node/src/request/persistTransaction.ts (2)
99-105: Well-implemented success loggingThe addition of debug logging after successful transaction completion, including
transactionHashandchannelId, enhances the observability of the Request Node. This change addresses the objective of logging every outgoing response and follows the recommendations from previous reviews.The log message format is clear and consistent, providing essential information without unnecessary details. Good job on implementing the suggested improvements.
Line range hint
1-124: Overall excellent improvements to logging and error handlingThe changes made to the
PersistTransactionHandlerclass significantly enhance the logging and error handling capabilities of the Request Node. These improvements address the main objectives of the PR, including:
- Logging every incoming request and outgoing response
- Clearly labeling logged data
- Implementing logging for timeout events
The code now provides more comprehensive and detailed logs, which will greatly improve the ability to monitor and debug the Request Node.
Key improvements:
- Addition of timeout handling with detailed logging
- Enhanced logging for transaction persistence, confirmation, and errors
- Clearer labeling of logged data, including
transactionHashandchannelIdRemaining suggestions for consideration:
- Add a null check for
clientRequest.body.transactionDatabefore calculating the hash- Extract the timeout duration to a constant for improved readability
- Use template literals consistently for log messages
- Consider combining error and debug logs for failed transactions
Overall, these changes represent a significant step forward in improving the Request Node's logging system. Great job on implementing most of the suggested improvements from previous reviews!
packages/request-node/src/request/ipfsAdd.ts (1)
56-62: Logging enhancements are well implementedThe success logging provides valuable information for monitoring and debugging, aligning with the PR objectives.
Description of the changes
Fixes #1391
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
morganlogging middleware for enhanced request logging on the server.Bug Fixes