Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

epacoverage #249

Open
wants to merge 149 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

epacoverage #249

wants to merge 149 commits into from

Conversation

jgaleotti
Copy link
Contributor

trying third pull request ;)

crazy2k and others added 30 commits December 1, 2015 13:57
@crazy2k
Inital commit for EPA coverage
8843f1a
@crazy2k
Add (non-functional) EPA coverage criteria
24309d3
@crazy2k
Allow EPACoverageFitness#getFitness to display a basic stacktrace of …
909c74e 
…executions
@crazy2k
Add EPA XML constructor
47e97b9
@crazy2k
Add EPATrace constructor
ae0f02c
@crazy2k
Complete missing methods in EPA-related classes
cb1a024
@crazy2k
Simulate until MethodCall.endState is implemented
3334349
@crazy2k
Tune EPA classes
d7a2001
@crazy2k
Add EPACoverageTest
364cb1e
@crazy2k
Comment out EPA in getFitnessFactory()
0c81ef7
@crazy2k
Only consider actions that are in the EPA
4105799
new EvoSuite property EPA_XML_PATH
12c64da
new EPA Factory
e2d7f00
new unit test case for EPA coverage
d2ce252
refactor: EPA is now EPATRANSITION
083e8df
changes to ListItr test subject
57d38d3
unit test case with execution traces
37f244c
Bounded Stack source code
0572997
refactor: minor changes
045819b
EPA Unit Test Cases
68fcf55
EPA Unit Test Cases
ddc5375
test case for MyBoundedStack
32556c7
EPA Unit Test
5af2716
revert
6e040f0
Stack: more unit test cases
efd6332
EPATransitionCoverageFactory is finished
4d6707c
Unit test for 2 object instances
88bb5fe
@crazy2k
Make EPATraceFactory get destination states from trace
cf7c91b
@crazy2k
Instrumentate ListItr
c67f959
@crazy2k
Merge branch 'epacoverage' of github.com:crazy2k/evosuite into epacov…
e05b77a 
…erage
jgaleotti and others added 28 commits June 9, 2018 09:36
@jgaleotti
new test case for exceptional transition of MiniBoundedStack
6af825d
@jgaleotti
new XML for MiniBoundedStack
92687c2
@jgaleotti
refactor EPA transition and EPA error coverages
74011c2
@jgaleotti
new criterion EPAEXCEPTION coverage
a12c39f
@jgaleotti
new test case for EPA exception coverage
a85cac7
@jgaleotti
new criteria for mining EPAs, EPAMINING
3090258
@jgaleotti
test moved to test folder
1642ae1
@jgaleotti
Archive works for EPA mining coverage criterion
9e9e858
@jgaleotti
new property INFERRED_EPA_XML_PATH to write the inferred EPA
9aab912
@jgaleotti
placeholders for EPAADJACENTEDGES coverage
71ef784
@j-godoy
epaadjacentedges coverage
cfa6744
@j-godoy
epaadjacentedges coverage
aedfb28
@j-godoy
change goal name epaadjacentedges
79e0877
@jgaleotti
refactor: renaming and fitness for EPA adjacent edges
41f028b
@j-godoy
add exceptional transitions as goals in adjacentedges
77a42c0
@j-godoy
change fitness function in epaadjacentedges
86731f2
@j-godoy
change fitness function for EPAExceptionCoverageSuiteFitness
c309e4e
@j-godoy
implement compareTo method in EPAExceptionCoverageTestFitness
61c8c97
@jgaleotti
EPAAdjacentEdges generated goals on demand, the full list is never fu…
9188fc8 
…lly generated
@j-godoy
EPAAdjacentEdges generated goals on demand but Total_goals is calcula…
ab7ea66 
…ted as its theoretical maximum
@j-godoy
dont remove some invalid assertions
f826739
@jgaleotti
merge with 1.0.7 snapshot
151245d
@jgaleotti
bugfix: missing cases for EPA criteria in ArchiveUtils
31b777d
@jgaleotti
discarding redundant changes to BranchCoverageSuiteFitness
7d92421
@jgaleotti
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into epacoverage
c4d4883
@jgaleotti
Merge branch 'master' into epacoverage
5f15631
@jgaleotti
resolving merge conflicts
37bdf3c
@jgaleotti
resolving minor conflicts
d320e59
@jgaleotti jgaleotti requested a review from gofraser February 5, 2019 01:05
@gofraser
Copy link
Member

Getting back to this -- looks like there's merge conflicts now. We can merge this PR once the merge conflicts are gone....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gofraser gofraser Awaiting requested review from gofraser

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@jgaleotti @gofraser @crazy2k @j-godoy