Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(tile): add design tokens #10476

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

eriklharper
Copy link
Contributor

@eriklharper eriklharper commented Oct 2, 2024

Related Issue: #7180

Summary

Adds design tokens for the Tile component.

--calcite-tile-background-color: Specifies the background color of the component.
--calcite-tile-border-color: Specifies the border color of the component.
--calcite-tile-description-text-color: Specifies the description text color of the component.
--calcite-tile-heading-text-color: Specifies the heading text color of the component.
--calcite-tile-icon-color: Specifies the icon color in the component.
--calcite-tile-selection-icon-color: Specifies the color of the selection icon in the component.
--calcite-tile-selection-icon-color-hover: Specifies the color of the selection icon in the component on hover.
--calcite-tile-shadow: Specifies the box-shadow of the component.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement Issues tied to a new feature or request. label Oct 2, 2024
@eriklharper eriklharper marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2024 22:48
@eriklharper eriklharper requested review from alisonailea and jcfranco and removed request for jcfranco and benelan October 2, 2024 22:48
Copy link
Contributor

@alisonailea alisonailea left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Erik! Looking good. I have a few suggestions to ensure we keep the component aligned to current design patterns.

@ashetland can you confirm "heading" "description/text" align with the future cross-component heading patterns?

var(--calcite-color-text-3)
);
--calcite-internal-tile-heading-text-color: var(--calcite-tile-heading-text-color, var(--calcite-color-text-2));
--calcite-internal-tile-icon-color: var(--calcite-color-text-3);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's confusing to set all the -internal variable defaults here. Rather defaults should be set as the final fallback on the style prop itself.

@@ -7,42 +7,65 @@
* @prop --calcite-tile-border-color: Specifies the border color of the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-description-text-color: Specifies the description text color of the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-heading-text-color: Specifies the heading text color of the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-icon-color: Specifies the icon color in the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-selection-icon-color: Specifies the color of the selection icon in the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-selection-icon-color-hover: Specifies the color of the selection icon in the component on hover.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion:
replace all three icon tokens and the "tile-description" with
--calcite-tile-text-color and --calcite-tile-color-selected which covers the states and retains the overall design pattern

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How would a user override the icon color separately from the title or description text? Just --calcite-icon-color? Wouldn't it be more expected to use --calcite-tile-icon-color for the display icon?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because Tile now uses an actual calcite-icon for the radio and checkbox UI, the meaning of "icon" easily generates confusion too because there's the "selection" icon (radio or checkbox) and the "content" icon that displays above the heading. @macandcheese which icon are you referring to here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The content one. I thought the original set you had here made the most sense, just IMO - to your point it makes the distinction between selection icon more clear.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point.
Per some other discussions, like a more general "close-button" pattern I think there is a more global "selection-icon" pattern that we could use. As for the tile-icon, what about something like the following?

calcite-icon {
  color: var(--calcite-title-icon-color, var(--calcite-icon-color, currentColor));
}

Copy link
Contributor

@macandcheese macandcheese Oct 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that looks good. I think the “selection-“ prefix does make it kind of clear and we use it elsewhere, so agreed with some consistent naming there it’s not as bad.

I don’t think using component specific naming is an issue there - even when we have the global overrides I think we’d want publicly documented component-specific ones.

.selection-icon-example-class {
  color: var(--calcite-title-selection-icon-color, var(--calcite-selection-icon-color, “whatever underlying default”));
}

Having these at the component level even if there are underlying higher level props makes documentation easier as well IMO. Users won’t need to track down these possible properties.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed!

.selection-icon-example-class {
  color: var(--calcite-title-selection-icon-color, var(--calcite-selection-icon-color, “whatever underlying default”));
}

looks good.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@eriklharper eriklharper Oct 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I reading that right? Should it be --calcite-tile-icon-color ?

packages/calcite-components/src/components/tile/tile.scss Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/calcite-components/src/components/tile/tile.scss Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/calcite-components/src/components/tile/tile.scss Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -189,6 +218,8 @@
:host([selection-appearance="border"][layout="horizontal"]),
:host([selection-appearance="border"][layout="vertical"]) {
.container.selected:focus::before {
--calcite-internal-tile-shadow: inset 0 0 0 1px var(--calcite-color-brand);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

--calcite-internal-tile-shadow-color: var(--calcite-tile-color-selected, var(--calcite-color-brand));

@@ -202,21 +233,28 @@

:host([selection-appearance="border"][layout="horizontal"]) {
.container.selected {
box-shadow: inset 0 -4px 0 0 var(--calcite-color-brand);
--calcite-internal-tile-shadow: inset 0 -4px 0 0 var(--calcite-color-brand);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change this back to a static style prop

box-shadow: inset 0 -4px 0 0 var(--calcite-internal-tile-shadow-color, var(--calcite-color-brand));

}
}

:host([selection-appearance="border"][layout="vertical"]) {
.container.selected {
box-shadow: inset 4px 0 0 0 var(--calcite-color-brand);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only the "x" and "y" axis lengths are in changing between these box-shadows. You could probably simplify this down to a single style prop. Something like....

.container {
  box-shadow: inset var(--calcite-internal-tile-shadow-x) var(--calcite-internal-tile-shadow-y) 0 0 var(--calcite-internal-tile-shadow-color, none);
}

:host([selection-appearance="border"]) .container.selected { 
  --calcite-internal-tile-shadow-color: var(--calcite-tile-color-selected, var(--calcite-color-brand));
}

:host([layout="vertical"]) .container {
  --calcite-internal-tile-shadow-x: 4px;
  --calcite-internal-tile-shadow-y: 0;
}

:host([layout="horizontal"]) .container {
  --calcite-internal-tile-shadow-x: 0;
  --calcite-internal-tile-shadow-y: -4px;
}

--calcite-internal-tile-border-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
--calcite-internal-tile-heading-text-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
--calcite-internal-tile-icon-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
--calcite-ui-icon-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ui-icon-color is deprecated

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if removing this would constitute a breaking change or not, so I hesitate to remove that. All of these changes straight-up copied over from the tokens branch, so my guess is this is here for a reason to prevent a breakage. Unless we're ok with breaking changes on these PRs, I suppose it would be fine to remove it. @jcfranco thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor

@alisonailea alisonailea Oct 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the --calcite-ui-icon-color is deprecated but still available on the calcite-icon however it is overwritten by --calcite-icon-color. However we don't just want to replace --calcite-ui-icon-color with --calcite-icon-color in this case because that's not how we're styling calcite-icon as a sub-component in other components.

Instead this should be something like the following.

calcite-icon {
  color: var(--calcite-tile-href-icon-color, var(--calcite-color-text-link));
}

--calcite-icon-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
--calcite-internal-tile-border-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
--calcite-internal-tile-heading-text-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
--calcite-internal-tile-icon-color: var(--calcite-color-text-link);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need to add an extra token for this case --calcite-title-href-text-color

:host([href]:focus:not([disabled])),
:host([href]:hover:not([disabled])) {
  .container,
  .heading {
    color: var(--calcite-title-href-text-color, var(--calcite-color-text-link));
  }
  .container {
    border-color: var(--calcite-title-href-text-color, var(--calcite-color-text-link));
  }
}

…xt-color-hover" token to allow both a default and overridable hover color.
@@ -5,8 +5,9 @@
*
* @prop --calcite-tile-background-color: Specifies the background color of the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-border-color: Specifies the border color of the component.
* @prop --calcite-tile-description-text-color: Specifies the description text color of the component.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't we still want this? There are two different colors used for the heading / description UI ... I'd expect a css property to individually control each. cc @ashetland @SkyeSeitz to confirm.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@eriklharper eriklharper Oct 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alisonailea 's suggestion is simply to replace --calcite-tile-description-text-color with --calcite-tile-text-color which effectively serves as like the "body" default text color, and because it is applied to the .container div host element instead of the .description div, it will set a color for the whole content of the tile, including icons and other content.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Description and heading are different colors currently and will remain different colors in future Tile enhancements.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since there isn’t a default content slot, I’d expect the css props to match the property name for each.

Other content is slotted in. This is why I still think the “icon prop” would have its own css property.

As a user without knowledge of the component, setting the icon to the description color is confusing (or, having description / icon be text-color but then also having a “named” text color property for heading).

…ender this unnecessary and we don't want to ship a token we'll have to immediately deprecate
…so that one color token controls both the unfocused and focused states
…irectly on a calcite-tile element selector in CSS
… Restoring selection-appearance border selected styles with box-shadow rules.
…internal-tile-border-color and using brand token for hover, focus states on borders
…way of setting the color of the presentation calcite-icon using a direct color property, and adding additional --calcite-tile-href-icon-color-hover token that defaults to the link color
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Issues tied to a new feature or request.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants