Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactored externalSigner to use Typedefs #8541

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rolfyone
Copy link
Contributor

  • created a new suite of tests to show a number of different signing bodies.
  • had to do manual testing for external signer because no AT i think
  • I was able to get from phase0 -> bellatrix so this should cover most scenarios.
  • I believe most of the wrappers should be available in the api

partially addresses #8527

Documentation

  • I thought about documentation and added the doc-change-required label to this PR if updates are required.

Changelog

  • I thought about adding a changelog entry, and added one if I deemed necessary.

 - created a new suite of tests to show a number of different signing bodies.
 - had to do manual testing for external signer becuase no AT i think
 - I was able to get from phase0 -> bellatrix so this should cover most scenarios.
 - I believe most of the wrappers should be available in the api

partially addresses Consensys#8527

Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@gfukushima gfukushima left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, just a question about a Integration test that was removed

Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
… i cant easily do deserializable type for blockWrapper in this way...

Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul Harris <[email protected]>
@rolfyone rolfyone merged commit eda8e93 into Consensys:master Oct 8, 2024
17 checks passed
@rolfyone rolfyone deleted the 8527-1 branch October 8, 2024 02:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants