Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use correct terms when talking about content-type parameters #287

Open
relu91 opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Use correct terms when talking about content-type parameters #287

relu91 opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
core related to the core specification document

Comments

@relu91
Copy link
Member

relu91 commented Apr 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I noticed that in the content-type section, we refer to types with the + sign as parametrized but I can't find this nomenclature in the RFC6838. The RFC6838 defines as parameters the name-value pair list after ; which I think might confuse the readers.

Originally posted by @relu91 in #161 (comment)
@egekorkan egekorkan added the core related to the core specification document label Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
core related to the core specification document
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@relu91 @egekorkan