Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of backward incompatible changes that could be made if proposed to packaging #140

Open
henryiii opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@henryiii
Copy link
Collaborator

henryiii commented Sep 12, 2024

I'd like to track the changes that could be made if this is proposed to packaging (#103).

I'd also like to normalize the strings to use f"{value!r}" instead of f'"{value}"', which works better when a value is an int, for example, and more closely matches Python's output. This probably can be done in the main lib, though.

I think the packaging version could use packaging.metadata, and we could instead extend that with writing support?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant