Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ontology for assemblies #94

Open
AndreaGuarracino opened this issue Jul 10, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Ontology for assemblies #94

AndreaGuarracino opened this issue Jul 10, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
metadata
Milestone
Later

Comments

@AndreaGuarracino
Copy link
Collaborator

At least:

  • pangenome from only de-novo assemblies (should be of higher quality)
  • pangenome from de-novo assemblies and read mapping experiments (reference biased)
@pjotrp pjotrp added this to the Later milestone Oct 29, 2020
@pjotrp
Copy link
Collaborator

pjotrp commented Oct 30, 2020

I think it should always we a single pangenome. Just annotate the paths for different technologies.

@pjotrp
Copy link
Collaborator

pjotrp commented Nov 4, 2020

We'll add metadata for this.

@pjotrp pjotrp changed the title create different pangenomes Ontology for assemblies Nov 4, 2020
@pjotrp pjotrp added the metadata label Nov 4, 2020
AndreaGuarracino added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2020
@AndreaGuarracino
added the assembly_method field to distinguish de-novo assemblies fro…
d0ca181 
…m reference-based approaches #94
@LLTommy
Copy link
Collaborator

LLTommy commented Nov 4, 2020

The point is, this should not have been uploaded without proper meta data in first place. We are lucky in this cases and might be able to fix this on the fly, but that might not always be the case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
metadata
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Later
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@pjotrp @LLTommy @AndreaGuarracino