Allowing scoped package name for shareable configs

[jpapini]

According to the doc, shareable configs can only be named with the solhint-config- prefix.
These lines confirms this rule:

solhint/lib/config/config-file.js

Lines 68 to 81 in 3443eee

	const configGetter = path => {
	let extensionPath = null
	if (path.startsWith('solhint:')) {
	extensionPath = getSolhintCoreConfigPath(path)
	} else {
	// Load packages with rules
	extensionPath = `solhint-config-${path}`
	}
	const extensionConfig = require(extensionPath)
	return extensionConfig
	}

But I think we should allow users to name their packages with a scope like ESLint (doc).

For example:
@scope/solhint-config or @scope/solhint-config-myconfig.

This would support packages that are hosted on private repos like GitHub or Package Cloud.

[johnnyshankman]

Bump, this is a blocker for me atm. My private organization cannot use the extension system as we need our pkg to be private and scoped.

[johnnyshankman]

Updated line is now: https://github.com/protofire/solhint/blob/master/lib/config/config-file.js#L75

Eslint docs: https://eslint.org/docs/latest/extend/shareable-configs#npm-scoped-modules

[dbale-altoros]

@johnnyshankman @jpapini
Sorry for the late response.
There is a new release available and we will be updating solhint on regular basis with a dedicated team to it
Thanks for posting

I'm not sure I understand this issue, can you elaborate ?
Thanks!

[johnnyshankman]

@dbale-altoros so right here:
https://github.com/protofire/solhint/blob/master/lib/config/config-file.js#L68

you expect the npm package name to start with solhint-config- which means it can never be a privately scoped package on npm, as those always begin with @somecompany/the-pkg-name

example is that i want to deploy something like @manifoldxyz/solhint-config-default for my company.

example from npm docs:
https://docs.npmjs.com/creating-and-publishing-private-packages

[dbale-altoros]

Ok, thanks for the clarification
I understand the issue
I'm not sure about the impact of changing that... we need time to review this

Thanks a lot for posting!