Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UI] Review process tree’s organization and naming #1562

Open
HugoGenillier opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[UI] Review process tree’s organization and naming #1562

HugoGenillier opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@HugoGenillier
Copy link
Contributor

It might be hard and time consuming to find the right tools for your project. The organization and names are sometimes misleading or doesn't fit user's way of thinking which leads them to spent time groping their way to the process they need.

The process tree is extensive and keeps growing. The categorization should be studied to ensure it makes sense for every users, overall process needs to be more explicit which implies to always have well detailled description or preview upon selection (bottom left).

This recommandation is important but requieres a work on coherence since processes can be added by the community or comes from various libraries. Also this may imply a more in depth study on terminology used by users to find the right categorization.

@jcelerier
Copy link
Member

for this we should look into how it works in other systems. For instance how do people find objects in Max, TD, PlugData, Usine...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: TODO
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants