Tap maintenance and Homebrew development #4969
Unanswered
fugitiveMedia
asked this question in
Tap maintenance and brew development
Replies: 1 comment
-
Technically, that may be true. But for this we would need a very significant increase in CI time and infrastructure along with an even larger increase in people willing to maintain Homebrew. And especially that last one is not something feasible to bet on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Output of
brew config
Output of
brew doctor
Description of issue
Currently spidermonkey and rsyncui are being blocked from upgraded on my Monterey OS computer due to OS versions. I am very familiar with XCode versions restriction which make sense(even if they are insane, when I have 4 macs of differing age that can't get the version you demand:). I'm running 3 intel macs and have been running Homebrew since you started(before that MacPorts which seems to be keeping up to today:). Your structure of installs is better to control most of the time. I think (just a developer who has worked in developing since the late 80's) Wouldn't it be a more controllable if you required installed packages by version numbers for dependence and everything was a versioned install. That way an install from my issue could be installed based on appropriate dependencies and scale back versions if needed. The definition of a formula as the newest hinders your system more than helps it. That change could have helped when you cut archived systems! An adaptive versioning system would help break a bunch of issues you have.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions