28.1.1
#1279
Replies: 1 comment
-
-> #1352. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Even though I see it's straight out of the documentation, I think this could be made clearer.
The code is a bit odd because the first
result
is nothing (()
).This seems clearer to me:
(Alternatively, could do an assertion on the unwrapped value of result, but printing it seems clearer to me.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions