You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 20, 2022. It is now read-only.
If a previously connected consumer crashes and is restarted with the same configuration (especially with the same port number), the provider does not accept this new connection, apparently because it somehow assumes the old consumer instance still to be connected.
Instead, intended behavior should rather allow to re-initiate and resume the communication as if it was yet running like previous to the crash of the consumer.
(side note: at least in the HTTP transport the problem does not occur, restarting a consumer using the same port number does not affect the provider.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I cannot recreate this problem. I get a two minute delay in the provider for returning a message but there is nothing I can do about that as that is TCP/IP detecting that the otherside has timed out.
In my tests, after that two minute delay, it reconnects fine and returns.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
If a previously connected consumer crashes and is restarted with the same configuration (especially with the same port number), the provider does not accept this new connection, apparently because it somehow assumes the old consumer instance still to be connected.
Instead, intended behavior should rather allow to re-initiate and resume the communication as if it was yet running like previous to the crash of the consumer.
(side note: at least in the HTTP transport the problem does not occur, restarting a consumer using the same port number does not affect the provider.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: