Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

com.intellij.diagnostic.PluginException: ActionGroup should be registered using <group> tag: id="aws.toolkit.dynamoViewer.changeMaxResults" #5120

Open
danny-su opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug.

Comments

@danny-su
Copy link

com.intellij.diagnostic.PluginException: ActionGroup should be registered using tag: id="aws.toolkit.dynamoViewer.changeMaxResults" class="software.aws.toolkits.jetbrains.services.dynamodb.editor.actions.ConfigureMaxResultsAction" [Plugin: aws.toolkit]
at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.ActionStub.initAction(ActionStub.java:108)
at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.convertStub(ActionManagerImpl.kt:1714)
at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:2198)
at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImplKt.access$getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:1)
at com.intellij.openapi.actionSystem.impl.ActionManagerImpl.getAction(ActionManagerImpl.kt:411)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invokeSuspend(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:378)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invoke(ActionAsyncProvider.kt)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$loadAction$2.invoke(ActionAsyncProvider.kt)
at kotlinx.coroutines.intrinsics.UndispatchedKt.startUndispatchedOrReturn(Undispatched.kt:62)
at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt__Builders_commonKt.withContext(Builders.common.kt:163)
at kotlinx.coroutines.BuildersKt.withContext(Unknown Source)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider.loadAction(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:377)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider.access$loadAction(ActionAsyncProvider.kt:35)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1$1.emit(Emitters.kt:220)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$filter$1$2.emit(Emitters.kt:219)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$mapNotNull$1$2.emit(Emitters.kt:223)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.FlowKt__BuildersKt$asFlow$$inlined$unsafeFlow$3.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:114)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$mapNotNull$1.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:112)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$filter$1.collect(SafeCollector.common.kt:112)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invokeSuspend(Emitters.kt:36)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invoke(Emitters.kt)
at com.intellij.ide.util.gotoByName.ActionAsyncProvider$unmatchedStubsFlow$$inlined$transform$1.invoke(Emitters.kt)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.SafeFlow.collectSafely(Builders.kt:57)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.AbstractFlow.collect(Flow.kt:226)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperatorImpl.flowCollect(ChannelFlow.kt:191)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperator.collectTo$suspendImpl(ChannelFlow.kt:153)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlowOperator.collectTo(ChannelFlow.kt)
at kotlinx.coroutines.flow.internal.ChannelFlow$collectToFun$1.invokeSuspend(ChannelFlow.kt:56)
at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:104)
at kotlinx.coroutines.internal.LimitedDispatcher$Worker.run(LimitedDispatcher.kt:111)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.TaskImpl.run(Tasks.kt:99)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler.runSafely(CoroutineScheduler.kt:608)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.executeTask(CoroutineScheduler.kt:873)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.runWorker(CoroutineScheduler.kt:763)
at kotlinx.coroutines.scheduling.CoroutineScheduler$Worker.run(CoroutineScheduler.kt:750)

@danny-su danny-su added the bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug. label Nov 22, 2024
@rainer-wei
Copy link

Maybe related to #5012 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug We can reproduce the issue and confirmed it is a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants