You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, validator only checks for values of certain data model fields. I think it would be a good idea to check for field's type as well. I think we store expected type of the fields in the expected data template or we can introduce expected type template which stores expected type of data model fields. Probably having this support we can avoid such issues in future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, validator only checks for values of certain data model fields. I think it would be a good idea to check for field's type as well. I think we store expected type of the fields in the expected data template or we can introduce expected type template which stores expected type of data model fields. Probably having this support we can avoid such issues in future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: