Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generateClient observeQuery with filters does not seem to work if schema has composite identifier #13965

Open
3 tasks done
nootn opened this issue Oct 27, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working GraphQL Related to GraphQL API issues

Comments

@nootn
Copy link

nootn commented Oct 27, 2024

Before opening, please confirm:

JavaScript Framework

React

Amplify APIs

GraphQL API

Amplify Version

v6

Amplify Categories

api

Backend

None

Environment information

  System:
    OS: Windows 11 10.0.22631
    CPU: (24) x64 AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with Radeon Graphics
    Memory: 2.67 GB / 31.19 GB
  Binaries:
    Node: 20.12.1 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\node.EXE
    npm: 10.5.0 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\npm.CMD
  Browsers:
    Edge: Chromium (130.0.2849.46)
    Internet Explorer: 11.0.22621.3527
  npmPackages:
    %name%:  0.1.0
    @aws-amplify/backend: ^1.0.0 => 1.0.0
    @aws-amplify/backend-cli: ^1.0.1 => 1.0.1
    @aws-amplify/geo: ^3.0.35 => 3.0.35
    @aws-amplify/geo/location-service:  undefined ()
    @aws-amplify/pubsub: ^6.1.11 => 6.1.11
    @aws-amplify/ui-react: ^6.1.9 => 6.2.1
    @aws-amplify/ui-react-geo: ^2.0.16 => 2.0.16
    @aws-amplify/ui-react-internal:  undefined ()
    @aws-amplify/ui-react-server:  undefined ()
    @aws-amplify/ui-react-storage: ^3.2.1 => 3.2.1
    @aws-lambda-powertools/logger: ^2.1.1 => 2.1.1
    @aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtime: ^3.650.0 => 3.650.0
    @aws-sdk/client-cognito-identity-provider: ^3.592.0 => 3.592.0
    @aws-sdk/client-iot: ^3.608.0 => 3.608.0
    @aws-sdk/client-ses: ^3.658.1 => 3.658.1
    @aws-sdk/client-sns: ^3.658.1 => 3.658.1
    @bugster/bugster-js: ^1.1.2 => 1.1.2
    @chromatic-com/storybook: ^1.5.0 => 1.5.0
    @mapbox/mapbox-gl-draw: ^1.4.3 => 1.4.3 (1.3.0)
    @react-three/drei: ^9.110.0 => 9.110.0
    @react-three/fiber: ^8.17.5 => 8.17.5
    @storybook/addon-essentials: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/addon-interactions: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/addon-links: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/addon-onboarding: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/addon-themes: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/blocks: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/react: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/react-vite: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @storybook/test: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    @types/aws-lambda: ^8.10.138 => 8.10.138
    @types/dompurify: ^3.0.5 => 3.0.5
    @types/jest: ^29.5.12 => 29.5.12
    @types/mapbox__mapbox-gl-draw: ^1.4.7 => 1.4.7
    @types/node: ^20.14.9 => 20.14.9 (18.19.39)
    @types/react: ^18.2.66 => 18.3.1
    @types/react-dom: ^18.2.22 => 18.3.0
    @types/xml2js: ^0.4.14 => 0.4.14
    @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin: ^7.2.0 => 7.8.0
    @typescript-eslint/parser: ^7.2.0 => 7.8.0
    @vitejs/plugin-react: ^4.2.1 => 4.2.1
    aws-amplify: ^6.5.4 => 6.5.4
    aws-amplify/adapter-core:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/analytics:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/analytics/kinesis:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/analytics/kinesis-firehose:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/analytics/personalize:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/analytics/pinpoint:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/api:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/api/server:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/auth:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/auth/cognito:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/auth/cognito/server:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/auth/enable-oauth-listener:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/auth/server:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/data:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/data/server:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/datastore:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/in-app-messaging:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/in-app-messaging/pinpoint:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/push-notifications:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/push-notifications/pinpoint:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/storage:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/storage/s3:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/storage/s3/server:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/storage/server:  undefined ()
    aws-amplify/utils:  undefined ()
    aws-cdk: ^2.138.0 => 2.140.0
    aws-cdk-lib: ^2.138.0 => 2.140.0
    aws-sdk: ^2.1632.0 => 2.1632.0
    axios: ^1.7.7 => 1.7.7
    constructs: ^10.3.0 => 10.3.0
    date-fns: ^3.6.0 => 3.6.0
    dompurify: ^3.1.6 => 3.1.6
    esbuild: ^0.20.2 => 0.20.2
    eslint: ^8.57.0 => 8.57.0
    eslint-config-prettier: ^9.1.0 => 9.1.0
    eslint-plugin-prettier: ^5.1.3 => 5.1.3
    eslint-plugin-react-hooks: ^4.6.0 => 4.6.2
    eslint-plugin-react-refresh: ^0.4.6 => 0.4.6
    eslint-plugin-storybook: ^0.8.0 => 0.8.0
    geolib: ^3.3.4 => 3.3.4
    immer: ^10.1.1 => 10.1.1 (9.0.21, 9.0.6)
    jest: ^29.7.0 => 29.7.0
    prettier: ^3.2.5 => 3.2.5 (2.3.2, 2.8.8, 1.19.1)
    react: ^18.2.0 => 18.3.1
    react-dom: ^18.2.0 => 18.3.1
    react-icons: ^5.2.1 => 5.2.1
    react-router-dom: ^6.23.1 => 6.23.1
    react-toastify: ^10.0.5 => 10.0.5
    recharts: ^2.12.7 => 2.12.7
    storybook: ^8.1.10 => 8.1.10
    survey-react-ui: ^1.11.13 => 1.11.13
    three: ^0.167.1 => 0.167.1
    ts-jest: ^29.1.5 => 29.1.5
    tsx: ^4.7.2 => 4.9.1
    typescript: ^5.4.5 => 5.4.5 (4.4.4, 4.9.5)
    vite: ^5.2.0 => 5.2.11
    xml2js: ^0.6.2 => 0.6.2
  npmGlobalPackages:
    @aws-amplify/cli: 12.12.1
    @budibase/cli: 2.30.3
    appium-windows-driver: 2.12.21
    appium: 2.5.4
    azurite: 3.29.0
    corepack: 0.25.2
    generator-office: 1.9.8
    next: 14.2.1
    npm-check-updates: 16.14.18
    npm: 10.5.0
    yo: 5.0.0

Describe the bug

When using observeQuery, E.g: const client = generateClient<Schema>() then client.models.DeviceMeasures.observeQuery - if you supply a filter that uses those columns, you get a runtime error The variables input contains a field that is not defined for input object type 'ModelSubscriptionDeviceMeasuresFilterInput'. It seems there is an issue with the generated graphQL for the schema.

When using filters for any tables that just use the default in-built ID, this does not happen, the filters work fine.

Expected behavior

Data should be filtered correctly and no error shown.

Reproduction steps

In your resource.ts, set up a schema that has an identifier with a composite key (E.g. two string columns):

    DeviceMeasures: a
      .model({
        tenantId: a.string().required(),
        name: a.string().required(),
        measures: a.customType({
          ts: a.integer(),
          pwr: a.integer(),
          tankPct: a.float(),
          tankRem: a.float(),
          bmsPct: a.float(),
          bmsRem: a.float(),
          flow: a.float(),
          outPsi: a.float(),
          outKpa: a.float(),
        }),
        recentMeasures: a.json(),
      })
      .identifier(['tenantId', 'name'])
      .authorization((allow) => [allow.groupDefinedIn('tenantId')]),

We can see the "correct" looking graphQL is generated:

export const onCreateDeviceMeasures = /* GraphQL */ `
  subscription OnCreateDeviceMeasures(
    $filter: ModelSubscriptionDeviceMeasuresFilterInput
  ) {
    onCreateDeviceMeasures(filter: $filter) {
      createdAt
      measures {
        bmsPct
        bmsRem
        flow
        outKpa
        outPsi
        pwr
        tankPct
        tankRem
        ts
        __typename
      }
      name
      recentMeasures
      tenantId
      updatedAt
      __typename
    }
  }
`;

export const onDeleteDeviceMeasures = /* GraphQL */ `
  subscription OnDeleteDeviceMeasures(
    $filter: ModelSubscriptionDeviceMeasuresFilterInput
  ) {
    onDeleteDeviceMeasures(filter: $filter) {
      createdAt
      measures {
        bmsPct
        bmsRem
        flow
        outKpa
        outPsi
        pwr
        tankPct
        tankRem
        ts
        __typename
      }
      name
      recentMeasures
      tenantId
      updatedAt
      __typename
    }
  }
`;

export const onUpdateDeviceMeasures = /* GraphQL */ `
  subscription OnUpdateDeviceMeasures(
    $filter: ModelSubscriptionDeviceMeasuresFilterInput
  ) {
    onUpdateDeviceMeasures(filter: $filter) {
      createdAt
      measures {
        bmsPct
        bmsRem
        flow
        outKpa
        outPsi
        pwr
        tankPct
        tankRem
        ts
        __typename
      }
      name
      recentMeasures
      tenantId
      updatedAt
      __typename
    }
  }
`;

Code Snippet

When you create an observeQuery that tries to use the columns in the identifier:

  useEffect(() => {
    const subscription = client.models.DeviceMeasures.observeQuery({
      filter: {
        and: [
          { tenantId: { eq: device.tenantId } },
          { name: { eq: device.name } }
        ]
      }
    }).subscribe({
      next: ({ items }) => {
        setDeviceMeasures(items[0] || null);
        setLoading(false);
      },
      error: (err) => {
        notifyError('Error in DeviceMeasures subscription', err);
        setError(
          'Failed to fetch or update device data. Please try again later.'
        );
        setLoading(false);
      },
    });

    return () => subscription.unsubscribe();
  }, [device.tenantId, device.name]);

It will give the error The variables input contains a field that is not defined for input object type 'ModelSubscriptionDeviceMeasuresFilterInput'

Log output

//This is the output from my own logging code as above:

NOTIFY ERROR Error in DeviceMeasures subscription - {"type":"onUpdate","error":{"errors":[{"message":"Connection failed: {\"errors\":[{\"message\":\"The variables input contains a field that is not defined for input object type 'ModelSubscriptionDeviceMeasuresFilterInput' \"}]}"}]}}

aws-exports.js

No response

Manual configuration

No response

Additional configuration

No response

Mobile Device

No response

Mobile Operating System

No response

Mobile Browser

No response

Mobile Browser Version

No response

Additional information and screenshots

As a workaround, I can allow it to retieve all items by removing the filter, then filter in the UI, but this will not be efficient at scale as I may have many records coming back that I just ignore:

  useEffect(() => {
    const subscription = client.models.DeviceMeasures.observeQuery({
      /* we will remove the filter as there is a bug preventing it working - filter after
      filter: {
        and: [
          { tenantId: { eq: device.tenantId } },
          { name: { eq: device.name } }
        ]
      }
      */
    }).subscribe({
      next: ({ items }) => {
        //once bug is fixed we can put this back: setDeviceMeasures(items[0] || null);
        //for now, filter here
        setDeviceMeasures(items.filter(item => item.tenantId === device.tenantId && item.name === device.name)[0] || null);
        setLoading(false);
      },
      error: (err) => {
        notifyError('Error in DeviceMeasures subscription', err);
        setError(
          'Failed to fetch or update device data. Please try again later.'
        );
        setLoading(false);
      },
    });

    return () => subscription.unsubscribe();
  }, [device.tenantId, device.name]);
@github-actions github-actions bot added pending-triage Issue is pending triage pending-maintainer-response Issue is pending a response from the Amplify team. labels Oct 27, 2024
@cwomack cwomack added the GraphQL Related to GraphQL API issues label Oct 28, 2024
@chrisbonifacio chrisbonifacio self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
@chrisbonifacio chrisbonifacio added to-be-reproduced Used in order for Amplify to reproduce said issue and removed pending-triage Issue is pending triage labels Oct 29, 2024
@chrisbonifacio chrisbonifacio added bug Something isn't working and removed to-be-reproduced Used in order for Amplify to reproduce said issue pending-maintainer-response Issue is pending a response from the Amplify team. labels Nov 20, 2024
@chrisbonifacio
Copy link
Member

Hi @nootn 👋 thanks for raising this issue. apologies for the delay.
I was able to consistently reproduce the error when attempting to subscribe to changes on the DeviceMeasures model with observeQuery. I've labeled this issue as a bug for the team to investigate further. we will report back with any findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working GraphQL Related to GraphQL API issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants