"Legacy" Lambda Layers keep failing deployments #13855
Labels
not-reproducible
Not able to reproduce the issue
pending-response
Issue is pending response from the issue author
pending-triage
Issue is pending triage
How did you install the Amplify CLI?
npm
If applicable, what version of Node.js are you using?
20.12.1
Amplify CLI Version
12.12.4
What operating system are you using?
Mac
Did you make any manual changes to the cloud resources managed by Amplify? Please describe the changes made.
no
Describe the bug
amplify push fails from time to time with error
Resource is not in the state stackUpdateComplete
. When I look at the error detail in cloudformation, the error is:The following resource(s) failed to create: [LambdaLayerVersion675d0075, LambdaLayerPermissionAwsAccounts914282159778e0e2307fLegacy406].
and
Resource handler returned message: "1 validation error detected: Value '914282159778e0e2307f' at 'principal' failed to satisfy constraint: Member must satisfy regular expression pattern: \d{12}|\*|arn:(aws[a-zA-Z-]*):iam::\d{12}:root (Service: AWSLambdaInternal; Status Code: 400; Error Code: ValidationException; Request ID: f11c4ba0-5e26-4eca-a520-39c4ed933b61; Proxy: null)" (RequestToken: b59897b3-cc95-1d5c-3e8a-7c499e5b1214, HandlerErrorCode: GeneralServiceException)
The issue is these "legacy" layers in my *Layer-awscloudformation-template.json file:
But these layers are not legacy at all. They've been deployed in the last few months. I workaround this issue by deleting the layer manually and removing the "Legacy" entries in the cloudformation file like the one above. However, this error is now affecting the latest layer I have, so if I delete it, my lambdas will not function correctly.
Expected behavior
amplify push should just work and update layers
Reproduction steps
Unclear what the repro steps are, but this issue has been happening now in pretty much every push in one specific environment in my stack.
Project Identifier
3def1a2bd59d61900f734d59f169a578
Log output
Additional information
This issue is also discussed in #8525 but the resolution there does not work.
Before submitting, please confirm:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: