Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CZML drawing order in 3D is opposite to 2D #992

Closed
dcrossleyau opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

CZML drawing order in 3D is opposite to 2D #992

dcrossleyau opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@dcrossleyau
Copy link

Use the CZML data files mentioned at Issue #991. Switch between 2D and 3D modes. Notice that the draw order is different.

The two test files as a Gist:
https://gist.github.com/indexgeo/830361f6d1997dfe5099

@dcrossleyau
Copy link
Author

These plot concentric circles near Sydney Opera House, in 10-pixel increments. In one mode the data has an "archery target" effect, in the other mode the outer larger point obscures the other points. And vice versa when the packets in the CZML file are in the reverse order.

@stevage
Copy link
Contributor

stevage commented Feb 25, 2016

Sorry to take so long to respond to this. Is there a clearly defined "correct" order? Or is the behaviour undefined, and we just happen to be displaying it differently in the two modes?

@dcrossleyau
Copy link
Author

AFAIK, it is the latter.

This message indicates that a way to actually specify that is on the roadmap:
Re: z index in cesium
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/cesium-dev/Wf04lWlzf_Y/j8xRp2c4hJgJ

Also found this:
Z-ordering
AnalyticalGraphicsInc/czml-writer#20

@kring
Copy link
Member

kring commented Oct 16, 2016

Not something we can do without support from Cesium, which is a major undertaking. Closing.

@kring kring closed this as completed Oct 16, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants