Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring the syntax for projections #88

Open
tclose opened this issue Feb 24, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Refactoring the syntax for projections #88

tclose opened this issue Feb 24, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@tclose
Copy link
Contributor

tclose commented Feb 24, 2015

Several improvements to the Projection element syntax were discussed and agreed upon at the meeting in Antwerp but postponed until version 2.0.

  • Instead of the delay being specified by a Delay element with the Projection, delays would become a properties of PortConnection objects
  • Response and Plasticity elements were to be combined into a single element Synapse, which could then have independent response and plasticity elements as subcomponents (assuming Multi-component dynamic models #4 is accepted for v2.0)
@tclose
Copy link
Contributor Author

tclose commented Mar 18, 2015

A benefit of combing the Response and Plasticity into Synapse would be to be able to "package" the two together in case that you had some more complicated properties of the response you wanted to modulate

@NineML-Committee
Copy link
Contributor

response \
                  ----- Synapse
plasticity /

Source -> Pre
Destination -> Post
Connectivity -> Connectivity
Delay -> To the event and analog port connections

@tclose tclose added the accepted label Apr 2, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants