You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While I understand that (probably), the statements themselves seem to be ordered by "importance" (I guess? It's also debatable. I'd prefer alphabetic ordering here as well), I really don't think this ordering is useful: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/statements/create
Other sections with subsections are also affected. My request here is mostly about the menu, not about the contents of the sections themselves, which may have some reason to choose alternative ordering or grouping, such as the aggregate functions, which are grouped as "standard" and "clickhouse specific": https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/aggregate-functions/reference
Though again, within the "standard" group, there's no logical (to me) ordering, so why not just order things alphabetically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A lot of subsections of the statement section aren't ordered alphabetically in the menu:
https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/statements
While I understand that (probably), the statements themselves seem to be ordered by "importance" (I guess? It's also debatable. I'd prefer alphabetic ordering here as well), I really don't think this ordering is useful:
https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/statements/create
Or here:
https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/statements/alter
Other sections with subsections are also affected. My request here is mostly about the menu, not about the contents of the sections themselves, which may have some reason to choose alternative ordering or grouping, such as the aggregate functions, which are grouped as "standard" and "clickhouse specific":
https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/aggregate-functions/reference
Though again, within the "standard" group, there's no logical (to me) ordering, so why not just order things alphabetically.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: