You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the UG, it was specified that providing multiple fields with the filter command results in an OR search and that multiple filter commands can be executed in succession in order to carry out an AND search
In the above example, I've populated the application with two similar contacts Alex Yeoh and Alex Yeo respectively with almost identical fields
I want to carry out an AND search for a contact with name containing Alex and phone number being equal to 87438806
From the UG we know that filter name: Alex phone.is: 87438806 will not work
So I attempt to first filter by name using filter name: Alex which gets me this updated list of contacts
Now I'd like to find the contact whose phone number is exactly 87438806 and contains Alex in their name using filter phone.is: 87438806 but this gets me this updated list of contacts
filter phone.is: 87433806 name: Alex is no better as it gives all three contacts (same as per the OR search)
To conclude it seems that searching for contacts matching ALL fields is hard or even impossible on the application. I think it's best to either implement an AND functionality for the search or not include that segment in the UG as it could potentially mislead users.
In the UG, it was specified that providing multiple fields with the filter command results in an OR search and that multiple filter commands can be executed in succession in order to carry out an AND search
In the above example, I've populated the application with two similar contacts
Alex Yeoh
andAlex Yeo
respectively with almost identical fieldsI want to carry out an AND search for a contact with name containing
Alex
and phone number being equal to87438806
From the UG we know that
filter name: Alex phone.is: 87438806
will not workSo I attempt to first filter by name using
filter name: Alex
which gets me this updated list of contactsNow I'd like to find the contact whose phone number is exactly
87438806
and containsAlex
in their name usingfilter phone.is: 87438806
but this gets me this updated list of contactsfilter phone.is: 87433806 name: Alex
is no better as it gives all three contacts (same as per the OR search)To conclude it seems that searching for contacts matching ALL fields is hard or even impossible on the application. I think it's best to either implement an AND functionality for the search or not include that segment in the UG as it could potentially mislead users.
Labels:
type.FunctionalityBug
severity.Medium
original: gavingoh99/ped#5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: